Hi,
There was work on a patch [1] to fix the liberty stable branch. However, we are
running into problems with the functional tests, because the functional tests
were set up differently in liberty eg. The current [2] magnum.yaml compared to
the old one [3].
This leads us with two options to t
> Hey Folks,
>
> I'm looking at doing some cleanups in our repo and I would like to start by
> deprecating the `run_tests` script and the contents in the `tools/` dir.
>
> As far as I can tell, no one is using this code - we're not even using it in
> the
> gate - as it was broken until recently,
Hi,
There is the following spec for review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249950/ for allowing the modification
of protected properties with service tokens in Glance.
John & Stuart suggest using service tokens for the following Nova spec:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/206431/ (Inheritable a
Hi,
Currently glance will use an auth_url if in the database. Eg. 10.0.0.8:5000/v2.0
However glance currently takes the auth_version from the config
files. Therefore this can lead to a mismatch of keystone version to be used
between the url and the config files. This is problematic due to a diffe
> From: Julien Danjou [jul...@danjou.info]
> Sent: 07 October 2015 10:12
>
> On Wed, Oct 07 2015, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
> > I'm not trying to solve the lack of reviews in Liberty by removing
> > patches. What I'd like to do, though, is help to keep around patches
> > that really matter.
>
> I
9:38, "michael mccune" wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >On 07/23/2015 12:43 PM, Ryan Brown wrote:
> > >> >> On 07/23/2015 12:13 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> > >> >>> On 07/23/2015 10:53 AM, Bunting, Niall wrote:
> > &
Hi,
Currently when a body is passed to an API operation that explicitly does not
allow bodies Glance throws a 500.
Such as in this bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1475647 This
is an example of a GET however this also applies to other requests.
What should Glance do rather th
