Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Status of the nova-network to Neutron migration work

2015-03-31 Thread Dr. Jens Rosenboom
Am 01/04/15 um 04:10 schrieb Kevin Benton: It's worth pointing out here that the in-tree OVS solution controls traffic using iptables on regular bridges too. The difference between the two occurs when it comes to how traffic is separated into different networks. It's also worth noting that DVR r

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] creating stable branches for all libraries, Oslo, client, and other

2015-03-25 Thread Dr. Jens Rosenboom
Am 24/03/15 um 22:22 schrieb Joe Gordon: On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: We have a cross-project spec up for review discussing a change in the release process precipitated by the fact that we are now capping library versions in stable branch test configurations. We’ve tal

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] python-glanceclient release 0.16.1

2015-03-05 Thread Dr. Jens Rosenboom
Am 05/03/15 um 17:52 schrieb Doug Hellmann: On Thu, Mar 5, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: The clients in general do not back port patches. Someone should work with stable-maint to raise the cap in Icehouse and Juno. I suspect, however, that those caps were added due to the client break

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] [stable] python-glanceclient release 0.16.1

2015-03-05 Thread Dr. Jens Rosenboom
x27;t necessary"? On 3/5/15, 10:28, "Dr. Jens Rosenboom" wrote: Am 05/03/15 um 06:02 schrieb Nikhil Komawar: The python-glanceclient release management team is pleased to announce: python-glanceclient version 0.16.1 has been released on Thursday, Mar 5th around 04:56

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] python-glanceclient release 0.16.1

2015-03-05 Thread Dr. Jens Rosenboom
Am 05/03/15 um 06:02 schrieb Nikhil Komawar: The python-glanceclient release management team is pleased to announce: python-glanceclient version 0.16.1 has been released on Thursday, Mar 5th around 04:56 UTC. The release includes a bugfix for [1], which is affecting us in Icehouse, most

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova]nova not work with eventlet 0.16.0

2015-01-14 Thread Dr. Jens Rosenboom
Am 14/01/15 um 05:17 schrieb Adam Gandelman: So eventlet 0.16.x has started hitting slaves and breaking stable branches (its not like we weren't warned :\ ) https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1410626 Should hopefully be resolved by eventlet versions caps in icehouse + juno's requirements: ht

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova]nova not work with eventlet 0.16.0

2015-01-06 Thread Dr. Jens Rosenboom
Am 06/01/15 um 18:01 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange: On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:36:38PM +0100, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: On 01/06/2015 05:33 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:21:10AM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: Odd...eventlet 0.16.0 was released on 12/30 and the eventlet.util

Re: [openstack-dev] Problem installing devstack

2015-01-05 Thread Dr. Jens Rosenboom
Am 06/01/15 um 04:40 schrieb Rajdeep Dua: Getting this error while running stack.sh in devstack Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement SQLAlchemy<=0.8.99,<=0.9.99,>=0.8.4,>=0.9.7 (from keystone==2014.2.dev114) (from versions: 0.4.2p3, 0.4.7p1, 0.5.4p1, 0.5.4p2, 0.1.0, 0.1.1, 0.1

[openstack-dev] Git client vulnerability

2014-12-19 Thread Dr. Jens Rosenboom
As this may affect a reasonable percentage of the target audience, I would like to make everyone aware of https://github.com/blog/1938-vulnerability-announced-update-your-git-clients While github.com claim to have patched their servers, people using other repos may want to be extra cautious.