Big +1
Franck
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Nikhil Manchanda
> wrote:
>
>> Big +1 from me.
>> Anita has been super helpful, both with reviews and with discussions on
>> IRC.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:34 AM, James E. Bl
I am experiencing the exact same issue. Several reviews did not rebase
recently, which make some of my tests fail.
What should be the behaviour from the CI point of view ?
1) -1 and request a rebase
2) 0 and request a rebase
3) Ci to do the cherry pick but like Kevin was stating, it need some
custo
Hi Edgar,
I am running the Nuage CI.
The Nuage CI has run and posted successfully the result for the first
review.
Because of infra issue(internet can be down, etc) we are running manually
the -1
-1 take some time away for developper and before doing a -1, I want to be
sure that it's a valid iss
Hi James,
I have added the Nuage CI system to the list; I also took the liberty
to reorder alphabetically the list
Franck
Franck
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:23 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've updated the registration requirements for third-party CI systems
> here:
>
> http://ci.open
Hi Jay,
Couple of points.
I support the fact that we need to define what is "success" is.
I believe that the metrics that should be used are "Voted +1" and
"Skipped".
But to certain valid case, I would say that the "Voted -1" is really
mostly a metric of bad health of a CI.
Most of the -1 are du
Hello,
I was wondering how everyone was doing 3rd party testing at the moment
when it comes to the process.
It takes me around 10 minutes for me to do a +1 or -1.
my flow is the following:
(I only use Jenkins for listening to the "feed")
1) a job is triggered from Jenkins.
2) a VM is booted
3) th
Hi,
I sent this message to the openstack-qa but it might be more to openstack-dev
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would need some clarification of the Tempest testcases.
> I am trying to run tempest on a vanilla devstack environment.
>
> My localrc file has the API_RATE_LIMIT set to false.
> This is the only