Re: [openstack-dev] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0

2016-07-05 Thread James Beedy
James, This is fine by me! +1 ~James Hi > > We're currently blocked on becoming an OpenStack project under the > big-tent by the licensing of the 26 OpenStack charms under GPL v3. > > I'm proposing that we re-license the following code repositories as Apache > 2.0: > > charm-ceilometer > c

[openstack-dev] Juju Charm Usability/Functionality Enhancements

2016-07-06 Thread James Beedy
Hello Team, I've a few things I want to bring up concerning usability/functionality in nova-cloud-controller and openstack-dashboard. 1. Request-timeout configurability for openstack-dashboard. - Everyone who accesses horizon asks me for this. I think it would be smart to set the timeout to t

[openstack-dev] [charms] Incorrect Padding for SSL Cert/Key

2017-01-28 Thread James Beedy
I'm having issues with padding when trying to specify key/cert as config options for Haproxy, and have experienced the same issue in the past, when trying to specify key/cert for the Openstack charms. Could someone give an example of what the correct padding of a base64 encoded ssl cert might look

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Incorrect Padding for SSL Cert/Key

2017-01-28 Thread James Beedy
l cert/key will work for the Openstack charms now that I've got the encoding part squared away. Still stumped by haproxy though ... can't seem to get it provision the cert/key correctly for the life of me. Possibly there is something else I'm missing here ... On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:

[openstack-dev] [charms][nova-compute] Services not running that should be: nova-api-metadata

2018-01-28 Thread James Beedy
Trying to bring up an Openstack, I keep hitting this issue where nova-compute is giving a status "Services not running that should be: nova-api-metadata" - are others hitting this? juju status | https://paste.ubuntu.com/26480769/ Its possible something has changed in my infrastructure, but I feel

[openstack-dev] [charms][ceph-radosgw] radosgw-admin?

2017-09-02 Thread James Beedy
Hello, Just wondering if the ceph-radosgw charm provides a method of configuring/accessing the radosgw-admin utility, or if there is a suggested way to get radosgw-admin working in conjunction with ceph/ceph-radosgw charms? In the ceph-radosgw charm, I see the radosgw-admin bin ends up in /usr/bi

[openstack-dev] [charms] Default KeystoneV3 Creds

2016-11-10 Thread James Beedy
Concerning the Juju Keystone charm, and api v3, can someone shed some light on how to find the default admin creds needed to access the keystone api, or what the novarc file might look like? I'm setting the 'admin-password' config of the keystone charm to "openstack", and am using this -> http://pa

[openstack-dev] [charms] Deploy Keystone To Public Cloud

2016-11-16 Thread James Beedy
I'm having an issue getting a response back (mostly timeouts occur) when trying to talk to keystone deployed to AWS using private (on vpn) or public ip address. I've had luck with setting os-*-hostname configs, and ssh'ing in and running the keystone/openstack client locally from the keystone insta

[openstack-dev] [charms] Barbican Hostname Config Params

2016-11-17 Thread James Beedy
Is there a specific reason the barbican charm doesn't have the os-{internal,private}-hostname config params? Thanks __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.opens

[openstack-dev] [charms] Barbican + Identity Standalone - AWS

2016-11-29 Thread James Beedy
Another great day of Juju driven successes - deploying the barbican standalone stack for identity mgmt and secrets mgmt. For those that don't know, newton horizon brings support for identity only! This means you can (as I am) use the openstack-dashboard for mgmt of just users, projects, and domains

[openstack-dev] [charms] Default SSL Service Endpoints

2016-12-04 Thread James Beedy
Running into a few bumps deploying keystone charm with SSL [1]. I'm wondering how others feel about having the Openstack charms account for a heightened level of security by opting to use SSL endpoints over plain http endpoints by default? Something tells me having services default to using SSL e