Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] [api] Swagger limitations?

From: Anne Gentle <annegen...@justwriteclick.com> Sent: 17 May 2016 15:35 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] [api] Swagger limitations? On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Jamie Hannaford <jamie.hannaf...@rack

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] [api] Swagger limitations?

All great points, thanks Anne and Sean. My responses are inline. From: Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> Sent: 17 May 2016 15:30 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] [api] Swagger limitations? On 05/17/2016 08:57 AM,

[openstack-dev] [docs] [api] Swagger limitations?

Hi all, Back in March Anne wrote a great summary on the current state of Swagger for OpenStack docs: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/090659.html. Is this still the current state of

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] How to document 'labels'

+1 for 1 and 3. I'm not sure maintainability should discourage us from exposing information to the user through the client - we'll face the same maintenance burden as we currently do, and IMO it's our job as a team to ensure our docs are up-to-date. Any kind of input which touches the API

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Deploying kolla from a container?

will bind into. That means it's network which openstack stuff travels on. Neutron_external_iface is iface tenant networks will be placed on. In you r case you could use eth0 as network and eth1 as neutron external. If it has IP that's ok...it simply won't be used anywhere:) On 28 April 2016 at 21

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Deploying kolla from a container?

really build to be run in containers, so we had to make sacrifices here and there. We are experimenting with kubernates now, as it supports both priv containers and net host. Let me know what if I can be any help. Michal On Apr 27, 2016 5:27 PM, "Jamie Hannaford" <jamie.hann

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Deploying kolla from a container?

Hi, Is it possible to deploy Kolla from a container rather than an ubuntu/centos VM? I have a Swarm cluster, so I don't really want to leave that ecosystem and start creating other cloud resources. I got quite far with the dev guide, but the step which seems to throw a spanner in the works

[openstack-dev] [magnum] Microversions usage

?I recently discovered that Magnum supports microversions [1] - but it doesn't seem to be incrementing the API in accordance with new functionality releases. Is this due to the v1 API not being locked yet? What is the status of freezing the API, so that we can move to a microversions-based

[openstack-dev] [Magnum] COE drivers spec

Hi all, I'm writing the spec for the COE drivers, and I wanted some feedback about what it should include. I'm trying to reconstruct some of the discussion that was had at the mid-cycle meet-up, but since I wasn't there I need to rely on people who were :) >From my perspective, the spec

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] COE drivers spec

ng Bei Wang West Road, Haidian District Beijing P.R.China 100193 Follow your heart. You are miracle! [Inactive hide details for Jamie Hannaford ---17/03/2016 07:24:41 pm---Hi all, I'm writing the spec for the COE d

[openstack-dev] [magnum] Nesting /containers resource under /bays

I've recently been gathering feedback about the Magnum API and one of the things that people commented on? was the global /containers endpoints. One person highlighted the danger of UUID collisions: """ It takes a container ID which is intended to be unique within that individual cluster.

[openstack-dev] Using openstack-ansible to install Neutron LBaaS v2

How do I install https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lbaas? using openstack-ansible? With devstack you can using the localrc file, but I'm unsure how to do it with Ansible. Any help would be appreciated! Jamie Rackspace International GmbH a company

[openstack-dev] [openstack-sdk-php] integrating transport and service layers

! Jamie Jamie Hannaford Software Developer III - CH [experience Fanatical Support] Tel:+41434303908 Mob:+41791009767 [Rackspace] Rackspace International GmbH a company registered in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland (company identification number CH-020.4.047.077-1) whose

[openstack-dev] [openstack-php-sdk] integrating transport and service layers

On June 23, 2014 at 2:16:18 PM, Jamie Hannaford (jamie.hannaf...@rackspace.commailto:jamie.hannaf...@rackspace.com) wrote: Hey all, Building on our previous discussion about the transport layer, we need to start thinking about it interacts with the service layer. I know we want a completely

[openstack-dev] [openstack-php-sdk] stream wrapper patch

a “step back in functionality”. But is this really the case? AFAIK the original StreamWrapperFS didn’t actually do anything when “rmdir” and “mkdir” were called. All this patch does is re-organize methods - it doesn’t actually touch functionality. Am I wrong here? Jamie Jamie Hannaford

[openstack-dev] [openstack-php-sdk] pending reviews

/99894/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99889/ I’m worried that the pace is slowing down. Thanks! Jamie Jamie Hannaford Software Developer III - CH [experience Fanatical Support] Tel:+41434303908 Mob:+41791009767 [Rackspace] Rackspace International GmbH a company

[openstack-dev] [openstack-sdk-php] Pending reviews

meeting: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98048/ Neither has code changes, so should be fairly simple to review. Thanks! Jamie Jamie Hannaford Software Developer III - CH [experience Fanatical Support] Tel:+41434303908 Mob:+41791009767 [Rackspace] Rackspace International

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-sdk-php] Use of final and private keywords to limit extending

. Given the reviews that have been put forth I think there is a different stance. If there is one please share it. - Matt Jamie Hannaford Software Developer III - CH [experience Fanatical Support] Tel:+41434303908 Mob:+41791009767 [Rackspace] Rackspace International GmbH

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-sdk-php] Transport Clients, Service Clients, and state

the public API defined by an interface. This is my take. If someone has a different take please share it with the reasoning. - Matt Jamie Hannaford Software Developer III - CH [experience Fanatical Support] Tel:+41434303908 Mob:+41791009767 [Rackspace] Rackspace

[openstack-dev] [openstack-php-sdk] Testing proposal

hard to mock. Does anybody have any major disagreements with my above proposal? Jamie Jamie Hannaford Software Developer III - CH [experience Fanatical Support] Tel:+41434303908 Mob:+41791009767 [Rackspace] Rackspace International GmbH a company registered

[openstack-dev] [openstack-php-sdk] Transport layer work

message, we also allow them the ability to retrieve the offending request/response with $e-getRequest() and $e-getResponse() --- That's about it, basically :) Does anybody have any questions or concerns with any of this? Jamie Jamie Hannaford Software Developer III - CH [experience Fanatical

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-sdk-php] discussion: json schema to define apis

://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenStack-SDK-PHP/JSON-schema-business-logic#So_how_can_it_be_done_well.3F Jamie From: Matthew Farina m...@mattfarina.commailto:m...@mattfarina.com Date: Thursday, April 24, 2014 at 5:42 PM To: Jamie Hannaford jamie.hannaf...@rackspace.commailto:jamie.hannaf...@rackspace.com

[openstack-dev] [marconi] API 1.1 feedback

- the `=` should be `:` Sorry if some of these issues have already been settled or discussed :) Jamie Jamie Hannaford Software Developer II - CH [experience Fanatical Support] Tel:+41434303908 Mob:+41791009767 [Rackspace] Rackspace International GmbH a company