n Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Jiahao Liang (Frankie) <
gzliangjia...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> The reason Barbican cert container has a property called consumer. The
> definition is as following:
>
>> What is a Consumer?
>>
>>
>>> A consu
ng to name
>> the function and wanting to just move on. T_T
>>
>>--Adam (rm_work)
>>
>> PS: Did we remove the local cert manager yet? Now I need to check... I
>> hope so, because it's not actually usable, nor can it be without API
>> modifications (which we
be calling the delete (which is not a real
> delete) when the LB is deleted, and not doing so is a bug, but I'll need to
> double check the logic as it has been a while since I touched this.
>
> --Adam (rm_work)
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017, 18:38 Jiahao Liang (Frankie) <
r to remove
the consumer. (
https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lbaas/blob/stable/mitaka/neutron_lbaas/common/cert_manager/barbican_cert_manager.py#L187
)
My questions are:
1. is that a bug?
2. or is it a intentional design letting the vendor driver to handle it?
It looks more like a bu
