Nova now can detect host unreachable. But it fails to make out host isolation,
host dead and nova compute service down. When host unreachable is reported,
users have to find out the exact state by himself and then take the appropriate
measure to recover. Therefore we'd like to improve the host d
ecisse." - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
From: Jiangying (Jenny)
[mailto:jenny.jiangy...@huawei.com<mailto:jenny.jiangy...@huawei.com>]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 3:36 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer][gantt]
Hi,
We have checked that gantt now just made a synced up copy of the code in nova.
We still think dynamic scheduling will be a benefit of the nova scheduler (or
gantt later). The main difference between static and dynamic scheduling is that
static scheduling is a vm placement problem, while dynam
e
[1] http://openstack-neat.org/
[2] https://github.com/openstack/gantt
2014-04-13 22:53 GMT-03:00 Jiangying (Jenny)
mailto:jenny.jiangy...@huawei.com>>:
Hi,
there has been a heated discussion about dynamic scheduling last
week.(http://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.o
Pacemaker provides the high availability for openstack infrastructure.
We'd like to deliver the vm-level HA to improve the business continuity with
openstack.
Besides host failure, Our HA mechanism can detect and report host isolation,
network partition as well as ha agent down.
Ha agent is pla
Hi,
there has been a heated discussion about dynamic scheduling last
week.(http://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg21644.html)
I am also interested in this topic. We believe that dynamic scheduling consists
of two parts: balancing computing capacity and optimizing power c
