On Aug 6, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 01:21 PM, David Chadwick wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/08/2013 18:11, Jay Pipes wrote:
>>> What SMTP, DNS and LDAP extensions are in use by systems that need to
>>> interoperate in the same way that Keystone does? <-- This is a genuine
>>> q
On Aug 6, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Adam Young wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 01:19 AM, Jamie Lennox wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Partially in response to the trusts API review in keystoneclient
>> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39899/ ) and my work on keystone API
>> version discoverability (spell-check disagree
m jsonschema and some method
> for prettifying the xml representation via jsonschema tags. The jsonschema +
> tags approach is probably a bit further off (maybe for v4?), so having an
> auto conversion which is ugly but functional seems better than no XML support
> at all.
&
On Jun 20, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 06/20/2013 11:20 AM, Brian Elliott wrote:
>> On Jun 19, 2013, at 7:34 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just wondering what people thought about how necessary it is to keep XML
>>> support for the Nova v3 API, given that if
There was a presentation by Pete Johnson in the San Diego summit about what
we're missing in OpenStack for enterprises and good support for XML was on the
list:
http://www.openstack.org/summit/san-diego-2012/openstack-summit-sessions/presentation/enterprise-to-openstack-here-s-what-you-re-missi
