Hi all,
I would also vote for (A) with 1500 UTC which is 23:00 in Beijing time
-:)
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Mohammad Hanif wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would also vote for (C) with 1600 UTC or later. This will hopefully
> increase more participation from the Pacific time zone.
>
> Th
ib/python2.7/dist-packages/oslo_messaging/localcontext.py",
line 55, in clear_local_context
2015-02-22 14:56:24.117 28042 TRACE oslo_messaging.rpc.dispatcher
delattr(_STORE, _KEY)
2015-02-22 14:56:24.117 28042 TRACE oslo_messaging.rpc.dispatcher
AttributeError:
_oslo_messaging_localcontext_9bb7d92
ig/cfg.py", line
2262, in _get_opt_info
raise NoSuchOptError(opt_name, group)
NoSuchOptError: no such option: policy_file
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015, at 04:29 AM, Joshua Zhang wrote:
> > Hi Stacker,
> >A
Hi Stacker,
A question about oslo.config, maybe a very silly question. but pls tell
me if you know, thanks in advance.
I know oslo has removed 'olso' namespace, oslo.config has been changed
to oslo_config, it also retains backwards compat.
I found I can run openstack successfully, but as
I'm sorry, my mistake due to my negligence, pls ignore my above reply.
sorry.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Joshua Zhang
wrote:
> 长波，
> 你对oslo比较熟，能帮我看看这个问题吗，
> https://answers.launchpad.net/oslo.config/+question/261550
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:13 PM, ChangBo
长波，
你对oslo比较熟，能帮我看看这个问题吗，
https://answers.launchpad.net/oslo.config/+question/261550
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:13 PM, ChangBo Guo wrote:
> Hi ALL,
>
> I have been working on bug 1414432 [1] recently, I would like do more
> discussion before further work.
>
> I'm talking about libvirt dri
pls note that actually this patch doesn't have minumum kernel requirement
because it only uses 'mount --bind' and 'net namespace', not use 'mount
namespace'. ('mount --bind' is since linux 2.4, 'net namespace' is since
Linux 3.0, 'mount namespace' is since Linux 3.8).
so I think sanity checks for
+1
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Aaron Rosen wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Kyle Mestery
>> wrote:
>> > The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December [1]. In
>> > looking at the current s
Hi Thomas,
I worked out a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100791/ based
on the latest strongSwan configurations, it can work. but the neutron-spec
is still on review, see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101457/
Can someone help review and approve that spec, thanks.
On Mon, Oct 1
