Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] v3-api-schema

2014-09-04 22:36 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague s...@dague.net: On 09/04/2014 09:30 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: Hi I'd like to request FFE for patches of v3-api-schema. The list is the following: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67428/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103437/ https

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Picking a Name for the Tempest Library

repository, into their own repo called openstack-integration-tests or os-integration-tests“. why not keeping it simple: tempest: importable test library tempest-tests: all the test cases Simple, obvious and clear ;) +1 :-) Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Nominating Jay Pipes for nova-core

big +1 :-) 2014-07-30 14:56 GMT-07:00 Sean Dague s...@dague.net: +1 On 07/30/2014 02:19 PM, Chris Behrens wrote: +1 On Jul 30, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: Greetings, I would like to nominate Jay Pipes for the nova-core team. Jay has been involved with nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][DevStack] Failed to install OpenStack with DevStack

Hi Jay, I faced the same problem and can pass it with adding the following line into localrc: LOGFILE=/opt/stack/logs/stack.sh.log Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi --- 2014-07-02 14:58 GMT+09:00 Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com: Hi, Does any one encounter this error when install devstack? How did you

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Spec Review Day July 9th

out the backlog. I'll send out another reminder the day before the review day. +1 for qa-spec review day. I've written it on my schedule. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][QA] Disabling the v3 API tests in the gate

/ Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi -- For the future micro versions, we still have those v3 test to be inspired by. Chris, does that seem workable? John ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][QA] Disabling the v3 API tests in the gate

/servers.py#L82 Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi --- [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98525/ [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84695/ ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] HTTP REST API error status code for out of quota errors

and the request SHOULD NOT be repeated. would fit to out of quota. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Branchless Tempest QA Spec - final draft

failed because of not backporting the Nova patch into Icehouse branch yet. I'm not sure we can backport this kind of patches into Icehouse because Nova v3 API of Icehouse must be experimental in future. So how about disabling v3 API tests in check-tempest-dsvm-full-icehouse? Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Checking for return codes in tempest client calls

2014-05-10 0:29 GMT+09:00 Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org: On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:50:03AM -0400, David Kranz wrote: On 05/07/2014 10:48 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: Hi Sean, 2014-05-07 23:28 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague s...@dague.net: On 05/07/2014 10:23 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Branchless Tempest QA Spec - final draft

2014-05-09 22:57 GMT+09:00 Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org: On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 10:31:00PM +0900, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: 2014-05-09 15:00 GMT+09:00 Ghanshyam Mann ghanshyam.m...@nectechnologies.in: Hi Sean, -Original Message- From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Checking for return codes in tempest client calls

Hi David, 2014-05-07 22:53 GMT+09:00 David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com: I just looked at a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90310/3 which was given a -1 due to not checking that every call to list_hosts returns 200. I realized that we don't have a shared understanding or policy about this.

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Checking for return codes in tempest client calls

Hi Sean, 2014-05-07 23:28 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague s...@dague.net: On 05/07/2014 10:23 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: Hi David, 2014-05-07 22:53 GMT+09:00 David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com: I just looked at a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90310/3 which was given a -1 due to not checking

[openstack-dev] [Nova] v2.1 API development status

expected. Any thoughts? Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi --- [1]: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/028724.html http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-February/027896.html [2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/tempest

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Branchless Tempest QA Spec - final draft

Hi Matthew, 2014-04-28 11:54 GMT+09:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com: 2014-04-28 11:02 GMT+09:00 Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:01:00AM +, Kenichi Oomichi wrote: Now we are working for adding Nova API responses checks to Tempest[1] to block

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Branchless Tempest QA Spec - final draft

# Sorry for sending this again, previous mail was unreadable. 2014-04-28 11:54 GMT+09:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com: This is also why there are a bunch of nova v2 extensions that just add properties to an existing API. I think in v3 the proposal was to do this with microversioning

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] QA Summit Meet-up Atlanta

lag Sunday, but the meet-up would be nice for me;-) Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Nova API] No Meeting this Week

Hi, Since this is the scheduled off week, I'm going to cancel this week's Nova API meeting. The next meeting will be on May 8th and will be at 00:00 UTC. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [cinder] Do we now require schema response validation in tempest clients?

, I don't have strong opinion for including the validation also. These schemas will be large sometimes and the combination in the same patch would make reviews difficult. In current Nova API test implementations, we are separating them into different patches. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-sdk-php] discussion: json schema to define apis

/nova/tree/master/nova/api/openstack/compute/schemas/v3 These schemas are used only for Nova v3 API, there is nothing for v2 API(current) because v2 API does not use jsonschema. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Summit schedule draft

the issue? Yes, that would fix the issue. Thanks for considering. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Branchless Tempest QA Spec - final draft

will be caught which is the desired behavior from tempest here. Yes, right. Thanks for clarify it. I have not found enough idea for this yet. Thanks Matt, I have gotten one idea for it! Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Future of the Nova API

the interoperability should depend on v2 API, that seems sandbox.. (I know that it is a little overstatement, but we have found a lot of this kind of problem already..) Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Putting nova-network support into the V3 API

Hi Chris, Thanks for your info, I got it. That is a quick response and enough for me:-) Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi --- 2014-02-13 Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com: Hi Kenichi, Ah yes, it was decided at the mid cycle meetup to delay the nova network changes until Juno. Sorry I should have

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [rfc] drop XML from v3 API entirely

the deserializing rule. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi --- On 2014年01月13日 22:38, Sean Dague wrote: I know we've been here before, but I want to raise this again while there is still time left in icehouse. I would like to propose that the Nova v3 API removes the XML payload entirely. It adds complexity

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [qa] api schema validation pattern changes

for the negative test generator. It would be necessary to hard-code API schemas in Tempest. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi --- The negative test patch in the shared fork https://github.com/mkoderer/tempest/tree/feature/negative_tests defines such a schema. The tempest patch will be updated from

Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] Undefined attributes in WSME

to release new WSME which includes new type classes? I'd like to try applying these classes to Ceilometer after the release because Ceilometer is the best for showing these classes' usage. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] api schema validation pattern changes

provide API definitions through API with jsonschema format, but Nova does not have such feature. We need to port these API schema from Nova to Tempest, I guess. right? Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Organizing a Gate Blocking Bug Fix Day

Hi Sean, That is good idea, I also am in. BTW, what time will this work start? I tried to join this kind of work, but I could not find anyone on IRC in my timezone. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi 2014/1/9 Sean Dague s...@dague.net: On 01/09/2014 08:01 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Sean Dague wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][nova] The document for the changes from Nova v2 api to v3

://review.openstack.org/#/c/59616/1/nova/api/openstack/compute/schemas/v3/agents_schema.py Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi --- 2013/12/7 David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com: On 11/13/2013 06:09 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:52 AM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/13/2013 08:30 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest] list of negative tests that need to be separated from other tests.

. Thank you for pointing this bp out. I added the etherpad link Ken'ichi pointed to this bp. Ken'ichi, should you be the owner of this bp? Unfortunately, I could not change the items of this bp from my launchpad account. Could you be the owner? Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi --- On Tue, Dec 3, 2013

Re: [openstack-dev] Top Gate Bugs

://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/ Thank you for the info, that is interesting. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Top Gate Bugs

this problem 4 times, but I am not sure this is worth or not. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi --- 2) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251784 neutron, Nova 328 Hits 3) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249065 neutron 122 hits 4) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251448 neutron 65 Hits Raw Data

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Duplicated test effort development

check this contents before starting this work. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Review request: Blurprint of API validation

] Review request: Blurprint of API validation On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/09/2013 07:45 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: Hi, The blueprint nova-api-validation-fw has not been approved yet. I hope

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Review request: Blurprint of API validation

://review.openstack.org/#/c/25358/ Thanks, Ken'ichi Ohmichi --- On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:37:15 +0900 Ken'ichi Ohmichi oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp wrote: Hi Russell, I assigned you as the approver of bp nova-api-validation-fw, so could you take a look at this bp? You have changed the priority from

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Review request: Blurprint of API validation

Hi Russell, I assigned you as the approver of bp nova-api-validation-fw, so could you take a look at this bp? You have changed the priority from Medium to Low these days. Could you show your concerns about this bp if you have. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi --- On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 20:45:57 +0900

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Review request: Blurprint of API validation

web framework(e.g. Pecan/WSME) in the future, we will be able to use this framework. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi --- On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 16:27:39 +0900 Ken'ichi Ohmichi oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp wrote: Hi, I have submitted a blueprint[1] and a patch[2] for Nova API validation. I request

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Review request: Blurprint of API validation

://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-June/009970.html - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-June/010057.html [4]: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-June/010814.html Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Use JSON Schemas to validate API requests data

working fine. I have written it on https://etherpad.openstack.org/NovaApiValidationFramework I think each project can select original WSME validation or jsonschema by its necessity, when each project moves to Pecan/WSME in the future. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi

<    1   2   3