Thanks, Nikhil, for offering to take on this responsibility.
I know you've had a lot of experience with Glance in the past and I feel
comfortable knowing that you'll be around to keep the project moving
forwards!
Cheers!
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Nikhil Komawar <
nikhil.koma...@rackspace.
Thanks for diving on this grenade, Alex!
FWIW, I agree with all of your assessments. Just in case I am mistaken, I
summarize them as smaller updates > logical clocks > wall clocks (due to
imprecision and skew).
Given the small size of your patch [4], I'd say lets try to land that. It
is nicer to
Greetings,
I will not be running for PTL for Glance for the Kilo release.
I want to thank all of the nice folks I've worked with--especially the
attendees and sponsors of the mid-cycle meetups, which I think were a major
success and one of the highlights of the project for me.
Cheers,
markwash
_
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
>> So you can remove all that code and just let requests/urllib3 handle it
>> on 3.2+, 2.7.9+ and for anything less than that either use conditional
>> dependencies to have glanc
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 11:54 AM, Brant Knudson wrote:
>
>
> I don't think anyone would be complaining if glanceclient didn't have the
> need to reach into and monkeypatch requests's connection pool manager[1].
> Is there a way to tell reques
Hi there logging experts,
We've recently had a little disagreement in the glance team about the
appropriate log levels for http requests that end up failing due to user
errors. An example would be a request to get an image that does not exist,
which results in a 404 Not Found request.
On one hand
In principle I don't think these changes need FFE, because they aren't
really features so much as fixes for better logging and
internationalization.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> There is two changes still not landed from
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/
I'm +1 on the FFE for both of these branches.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 09/05/2014 05:20 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > Flavio Percoco wrote:
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> I'd like to request a FFE for 2 features I've been working on during
> >> Juno which, unfortuna
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Tailor, Rajesh
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have submitted the patch "Made provision for glance service to use
> Launcher" to the community gerrit.
> Pl refer: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/110012/
>
> I have also set the workflow to 'work in progress'. I will start
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Scott Devoid wrote:
> So it turns out that fixing this issue is not very simple. It turns out
> that there are stubbed out openstack.common.policy checks in the glance-api
> code, which are pretty much useless because they do not use the image as a
> target. [1] T
I think there is some confusion about what the glance metadata api is going
to do.
We are *not* planning to store metadata about other openstack resources in
glance.
We *are* planning to store definitions of the relevant schemas of metadata
for other classes of openstack resources.
For example,
Thanks for sending out this message Malini.
I'm really pleased that the "image import" mechanism we've been working on
in Glance for a while is going to be helpful for supporting this kind of
use case.
The problem that I see is one of messaging. If we tell end users that
"OpenStack can import and
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Arnaud Legendre
wrote:
> All the things that you mention here seem to be technical difficulties.
> I don't think technical difficulties should drive the experience of the
> user.
> Also, Zhi Yan seems to be able to make that happen :)
>
+1
>
> Thanks,
> Arnaud
Hi folks,
In yesterday's team meeting, we picked July 24-25 in the San Francisco Bay
Area for our meetup time and place. More details will be added here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-juno-mid-cycle-meeting
This positions our meeting just a few days before the Nova meeting in
Portland,
Hi folks,
I'd like to nominate Nikhil Komawar to join glance-core. His code and
review contributions over the past years have been very helpful and he's
been taking on a very important role in advancing the glance tasks work.
If anyone has any concerns, please let me know. Otherwise I'll make the
I think the tasks stuff is something different, though. A task is a
(potentially) long-running operation. So it would be possible for an action
to result in the creation of a task. As the proposal stands today, the
actions we've been looking at are an alternative to the document-oriented
PATCH HTTP
t we're proposing a new mission in line with our broader aspirations.
However I'm quite happy to squash them together if folks prefer.
>
>
> - Erno (jokke)
>
>
>
> *From:* Mark Washenberger [mailto:mark.washenber...@markwash.net]
> *Sent:* 05 June 2014 02
Hi folks,
I'd like to propose the Images program to adopt a mission statement [1] and
then change it to reflect our new aspirations of acting as a Catalog that
works with artifacts beyond just disk images [2].
Since the Glance mini summit early this year, momentum has been building
significantly
I will provide a little more context for the TC audience. I asked Hemanth
to tag this message [TC] because at the Juno summit in the cross-project
track there was discussion of cross-project api consistency [1]. The main
outcome of that meeting was that "TC should recommend API conventions via
open
Hi Folks!
Ashwhini has put together a great survey to help us plan our Glance mid
cycle meetup. Please fill it out if you think you might be interested in
attending! In particular we're trying to figure out sponsorship and
location. If you have no location preference, feel free to leave those
chec
Hi folks,
Unfortunately, the leader for one of our proposed sessions is now unable to
attend the summit. The topic in question is "Signed Images" [1] and was
allocated a half-session slot. This is a call out to see if there are any
other folks who would like to lead this discussion. If not, no big
Hey hey glancy glance,
Recently glance drivers made a somewhat snap decision to adopt the "-specs"
gerrit repository approach for new blueprints.
Pursuant to that, Arnaud has been kind enough to put forward some infra
patches to set things up. After the patches to create the repo [1] and
enable t
The first draft of the Glance design summit session have been posted at
http://junodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/glance. We may still
shuffle the times and the exact split of the topics around a bit if there
are opportunities for improvement.
I would like to ask at this time if key contribu
Hi Erno,
Just looking for a little more information here. What are the particular
areas around keystone integration in the v2 api+registry stack that you
want to test? Is the v2 api + v2 registry stack using keystone differently
than how v1 api + v1 registry stack uses it?
Thanks
On Fri, Apr 18
Hi Saju,
VM imports are likely to show up in Glance under this blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/new-upload-workflow
Cheers,
markwash
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Saju M wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Amazon provides option to Import/Export VM.
> http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/vm-impo
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Keith Bray wrote:
> Steve, agreed. Your description I believe is the conclusion that the
> community came to when this was perviously discussed, and we managed to get
> the implementation of parameter grouping and ordering [1] that you
> mentioned which has been
Hi all,
I'd like to submit myself as a candidate to continue in the role of Glance
PTL for the Juno release cycle.
A bit of history about me: I joined Rackspace's Team Titan back in February
2011, where were initially focused on filling out the OpenStack 1.1 api for
nova. I've been working with G
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
> Hi stackers,
>
> As a result of discussion:
> [openstack-dev] [all][db][performance] Proposal: Get rid of soft deletion
> (step by step)
> http://osdir.com/ml/openstack-dev/2014-03/msg00947.html
>
> I understood that there should be another
Hi Anna,
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Anna A Sortland wrote:
> [A] The current keystone LDAP community driver returns all users that
> exist in LDAP via the API call v3/users, instead of returning just users
> that have role grants (similar processing is true for groups). This could
> potent
Hi folks,
I'd like to nominate Arnaud Legendre to join Glance Core. Over the past
cycle his reviews have been consistently high quality and I feel confident
in his ability to assess the design of new features and the overall
direction for Glance.
If anyone has any concerns, please share them with
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 03/12/2014 09:01 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> > On 11/03/14 16:25 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >> Hi. I asked in #openstack-glance a few times today but got no response,
> >> so sorry for the list spam.
> >>
> >> https://review.openstack.org/#
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 15:25 -0800, Mark Washenberger wrote:
> > I believe we have some agreement here. Other openstack services should
> > be able to use a strongly typed identifier for users. I just think if
> > we want
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 13:10 -0800, Mark Washenberger wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Henry Nash
> > wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> >
> > So we would not modify any exist
more and I'll be
quiet :-)
>
> Henry
>
> On 28 Feb 2014, at 17:38, Mark Washenberger <
> mark.washenber...@markwash.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>&
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 11:47 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
>> > For purposes of supporting multiple backends for Identity (multiple
>> > LDAP, mix of LDAP and SQL, federation, etc) Keys
Hi Georgy,
Thanks for all your efforts putting this together.
In the incubation request, one of the proposals is to include Murano under
an expanded scope of the Images program, renaming it the Catalog program.
I've been extremely pleased with the help of you and your colleagues in
helping to def
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> (This email is mostly directed to PTLs for programs that include one
> integrated project)
>
> The DefCore subcommittee from the OpenStack board of directors asked the
> Technical Committee yesterday about which code sections in each
> integr
I'd like to attend as well, since it is close for me and some upcoming
Glance efforts might be relevant. But I'm definitely more of a "chicken"
than a "pig" for this gathering so let me know if that kind of
participation is not really desired.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chicken_and_the_P
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 10:03 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> > IMHO, the bit that should really be optimized is the selection of the
> > store nodes where the image should be downloaded from. That is,
> > selecting the nearest location from the ima
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Mark Washenberger's message of 2014-01-30 12:41:40 -0800:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> > > (I'm not touching the question of whether Heat should have a Glance
> Image
> > > resource at all, which I'm
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 29/01/14 19:40, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 18:55 -0500, Zane Bitter wrote:
>>
>>> I've noticed a few code reviews for new Heat resource types -
>>> particularly Neutron resource types - where folks are struggling to find
>>
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Mark Washenberger <
mark.washenber...@markwash.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov <
> gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Happy Martin Luther King Jr.
k the 'killed' state or should we shoot for a more
> complicated/powerful state machine?
>
I think we can get by with trying to simplify the state that is involved
and fixing any bugs with our state management. Is there a specific problem
you're seeing with the
>
> --
&
It does not seem very ReSTful--or very usable, for that matter--for a
resource to be permanently modified when you a PUT fails. So I don't think
we need the 'killed' status. It was purposefully left out of v2 images,
which is not just a reskin of v1.
Perhaps there is still a bug where an image is
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Public Mail wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have two questions ...
>
> 1) Glance v1 APIs can take a --location argument when creating an image
>but v2 APIs can't - bug or feature? (Details below)
>
I'd call that a missing feature. I think we probably need
nce/+bug/1271426) and will have a go at a fix.
Thanks again for bringing this issue to our attention, Tom!
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Mark Washenberger <
mark.washenber...@markwash.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Tom Leaman wrote:
>
>> I
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Tom Leaman wrote:
> I'm looking at a possible bug here but I just want to confirm
> that I'm not missing something obvious.
>
> I'm currently working with Devstack on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
>
> Once Devstack is up and running, I'm creating a file
> /etc/glance/property-
justin.tv
If we do manage to get the broadcasting setup, I think remote participants
are going to have to provide their feedback through text-based means (i.e.
etherpad chat or IRC).
>
> Thanks,
> Georgy
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Mark Washenberger <
> m
Hi folks,
First things first: Happy Martin Luther King Jr. Day!
Our mini summit / meetup for the Icehouse cycle will take place in one
week's time. To ensure we are all ready and know what to expect, I have
started a wiki page tracking the event details and a tentative schedule.
Please have a loo
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 15/01/14 21:35 +, Jesse Noller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 15, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Doug Hellmann
>> wrote:
>>
>> Several people have mentioned to me that they are interested in, or
>>> actively working on, code related to a "common" clien
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Alexei Kornienko <
alexei.kornie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >I did notice, however, that neutronclient is
> conspicuously absent from the Work Items in the blueprint's Whiteboard.
> It will surely be added later. We already working on several things in
> parallel and w
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jesse Noller
> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 16, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Justin Hammond
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure if it was said, but which httplib using being used (urllib3
>> maybe?). Also I noticed many people were talk
This time, with content!
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> More discussions around the adoption of Pecan.
>
> I'd like to know what is the feeling of other folks about migrating
> existing APIs to Pecan as opposed to waiting for a new API version as
> an ex
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> More discussions around the adoption of Pecan.
>
> I'd like to know what is the feeling of other folks about migrating
> existing APIs to Pecan as opposed to waiting for a new API version as
> an excuse to migrate the API imp
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Jon Bernard wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to propose instance-level snapshots as a feature for
> inclusion in Nova. An initial draft of the more official proposal is
> here [1], blueprint is here [2].
>
> In a nutshell, this feature will take the existing c
Hi folks,
Late January, we will be having a mini summit focused on Glance and the
Images Program. All OpenStack ATCs and associated technical product folks
are welcome. Here are the details:
Where:
Hilton Washington Dulles Airport
13869 Park Center Road
Herndon, Virginia 20171
(I do not yet know
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 23/12/13 22:46 +0800, Zhi Yan Liu wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Flavio Percoco
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 23/12/13 09:00 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
>>>
>>>>
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 12/23/2013 05:42 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
>> Flavio Percoco wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/12/13 00:41 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
>>>
Cinder is for block storage. Images are just a bunch of blocks, and
all the store drivers do is take a chunke
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 21/12/13 00:41 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
>> On 12/20/2013 10:42 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> In the last Glance meeting, it was proposed to pull out glance's
>>> stores[0] code into its own package. There are a co
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> Dear Glance core,
>
> Until this review is sorted - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60971/2
Or this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61600/ rather
>
>
> You won't be able to merge any changes, because of the docs issue with
> sphinx.
>
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Randall Burt wrote:
> I too have warmed to this idea but wonder about the actual implementation
> around it. While I like where Edmund is going with this, I wonder if it
> wouldn't be valuable in the short-to-mid-term (I/J) to just add /templates
> to Glance (/asse
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 12/05/2013 04:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
>> Excerpts from Andrew Plunk's message of 2013-12-05 12:42:49 -0800:
>>
>>> Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2013-12-05 09:05:44 -0800:
> On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Clint Byrum
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Randall Burt wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Steve Baker
> wrote:
>
> On 12/06/2013 10:46 AM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Andrew Plunk
> wrote:
>
> >> Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2013-12-05 09:05:44 -0800:
> >>> On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Clint Byrum
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message
Hi folks,
Our normally scheduled meeting this week will not be held, since it would
coincide with a major U.S. holiday and I'll be busy at that time stuffing
my face with turkey and a wide variety of starches.
We'll pick up where we left off next week during our normal timeslot (which
is at 1400
e them to ease travel difficulties for
some. But there are likely some tradeoffs to consider.
Thanks for your interest
>
> Best regards,
> Boris Pavlovic
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Mark Washenberger <
> mark.washenber...@markwash.net> wrote:
>
>>
&g
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
>
> On 11/22/2013 06:55 PM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Robert Collins
> > mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net>> wrote:
> >
> > On 2
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2013-11-22 10:34:40 +0100 (+0100), Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > It can be created on request by release management members (or
> > infra-core team). I /think/ that by default it would get tested against
> > master in other branches.
>
> Mo
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> On 22 November 2013 22:31, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > Robert Collins wrote:
> >> I don't understand why branches would be needed here *if* the breaking
> >> changes don't impact any supported release of OpenStack.
> >
> > Right -- the trick
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Mark Washenberger wrote:
> > [...]
> > In order to mitigate that risk, I think it would make a lot of sense to
> > have a place to stage and carefully consider all the breaking changes we
> > want to make. I a
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Mark Washenberger's message of 2013-11-20 10:14:42 -0800:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > The project python-glanceclient is getting close to needing a major
> release
> > in order to finally remove some long-deprecated features, and to ma
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Mark Washenberger <
mark.washenber...@markwash.net> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> There's been some talk about copying Nova for a mid-cycle meetup to
> reorganize around our development priorities in Glance.
>
> So far, the plan is still ten
Hi folks,
The project python-glanceclient is getting close to needing a major release
in order to finally remove some long-deprecated features, and to make some
minor adjustments that are technically backwards-incompatible.
Normally, our release process works great. When we cut a release (say
1.0
Hi folks,
My summary notes from the OpenStack Design Summit Glance sessions follow.
Enjoy, and please help correct any misunderstandings.
Image State Consistency:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-summit-image-state-consistency
In this session, we focused on t
Hi folks,
There's been some talk about copying Nova for a mid-cycle meetup to
reorganize around our development priorities in Glance.
So far, the plan is still tentative, but we're focusing on late January and
the Washington, DC area. If you're interested and think you may be able to
attend, plea
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > [...]
> > That will not solve all issues. We should also collectively make sure
> > that *usage questions are re-routed* to the openstack general
> > mailing-list, where they belong. Too many people still answer off
Responses to both Jay and George inline.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Sorry for top-posting, but in summary, I entirely agree with George here.
> His logic is virtually identical to the concerns I raised with the initial
> proposal for Glance Tasks here:
>
> http://lists.
Resurrecting this thread. . .
I think I'm misunderstanding where we landed on this issue. On the one
hand, it seems like there are tests to assert that uniqueness of names is
case-sensitive. On the other, some folks have identified reasons why they
would want case-insensitivity on uniqueness chec
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13 2013, John Griffith wrote:
>
> > Trivial or not, people use it and frankly I don't see any value at all
> > in removing it. As far as the "some projects want a different format
> > of UUID" that doesn't make a lot of sense to
Hi folks,
We'll have a Glance team meeting this Thursday at 2000 UTC (don't forget
that UTC applies to both the time and the date!). In your timezone that is
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Glance+Meeting&iso=20131114T20&ah=1.
As usual the meeting room is #openstack-meeti
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Ian McLeod wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 11:56 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Ian McLeod's message of 2013-10-31 11:27:39 -0700:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Would any of you attending the summit be interested in snagging an
> > > unconference session t
Hi folks,
There will be a team meeting this week on Thursday at 20:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting-alt. That is, in your timezone:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Glance+Meeting&iso=20131031T20&ah=1
The agenda is posted here
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeti
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Eddie Sheffield <
eddie.sheffi...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>
>
> "Mark Washenberger" said:
>
> > ___
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> > I am not a fan of all the specific talk to glance code we have in
> > nova, moving more of that into glanceclient can only be a good thing.
> > For the XenServer itegration, for efficiency reasons, we need glance
> > to talk from dom0, so it has dom0 making the final HTTP call. So we
> > would
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> On 25 October 2013 10:04, Chris Behrens wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 24, 2013, at 1:33 PM, Robert Collins
> wrote:
> >
> >> -2 to 10 minute downtimes.
> >>
> >> +1 to doing the evolution gracefully. There is a spec for doing that
> >> from the H
Hi folks!
In the images api, we depend on iso8601 to parse some dates and times.
Recently, since version 0.1.4, python-iso8601 added support for a few more
formats, and we finally got some other issues nailed down by 0.1.8. Maybe
the fact that these formats weren't supported before was a bug. I do
Hi folks,
Please submit any design summit session proposals in the next 24 hours.
markwash
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hi folks,
Just reminding you that we'll have our meeting during the early timeslot
this week, at 14:00 UTC on October 24th. In your locale, that's
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Glance+Meeting&iso=20131022T14&ah=1.
The channel as always is #openstack-meeting-alt and all a
One relevant aspect here is that v2 and v1 for the images api are not
wholly compatible. For example, image properties in v2 can have schema
restrictions placed by a deployer--but v1 will ignore those restrictions.
So if you're using the nova image api passthru, auto-negotiating the api
version cou
Hi Glance folks,
There will be a team meeting this week on Thursday at 20:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting-alt. That is, in your timezone:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Glance+Meeting&iso=20131017T20&ah=1
The agenda is posted here
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-tea
Hi Glance folks,
We will have a team meeting this Thursday October 10th at 14:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting-alt. All are welcome to attend.
For time information in your timezone, see
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20131010T14&ah=1
The agenda can be found at
https://ether
Yay my email is working again, so I can finally +1 !
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> +1
>
> On 10/03/2013 12:25 AM, Iccha Sethi wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I would like to nominate Zhi Yan Liu(lzydev) for glance core. I think
> Zhi has been an active reviewer/contributor to th
+1
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Nikhil Komawar <
nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> -Nikhil
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Iccha Sethi"
> Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 12:28am
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> S
Hi folks,
Just to remind you, we'll be having a team meeting this Thursday, September
26th at 14:00 UTC. For your local time, please see
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Glance+Meeting&iso=20130926T14&ah=1
.
In particular, we'll want to make sure we've signed off on RC1 or
Hi all,
I'd like to submit myself as a candidate to continue in the role of Glance
PTL for the Icehouse release cycle.
A bit of history about me: I joined Rackspace's Team Titan back in February
2011, where were initially focused on filling out the OpenStack 1.1 api for
nova. I've been working wi
I respect the desires of packagers to have a stable environment, but I'm
also very sad about having to copy the OrderedDict code directly into
Glance. Can we actually verify that this is a problem for packagers? (I.e.
not already in their repos?)
It also may be possible that packagers who do not s
Hi folks,
I will be out this week after 23:00 UTC Wednesday, so I can't hold the
glance meeting this Thursday. I'll be back next Wednesday the 19th.
Let's get those RC1 bugs finished and reviewed!
Thanks!
markwash
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenSta
I buy an exception here if the configuration defaults to off (no change).
Thanks!
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote:
> > This change:
> >
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32919/
> >
> > is the final piece of a puzzle that allows a (potential
Eek, I might not actually be able to make this time on Monday. I'm free
from 9:30 Pacific Monday and on. Would Tuesday work? Or tomorrow?
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Brian Rosmaita <
brian.rosma...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> We're shooting for 15:00 UTC Monday 26 August. (Let me know ASAP if
Josh thanks for highlighting this. This example is a good reason why oslo
libraries should decouple their useful bits from any configuration
assumptions. Much of the code already allows use without requiring you to
adopt configuration code. But we should make all of it like that.
On Wed, Aug 21,
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
