Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Speaker Selection Process: OpenStack Summit Berlin

CFP work is hard as hell. Much respect to the review panel members. It's a thankless difficult job. So, in lieu of being thankless, THANK YOU -Matt On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Allison Price wrote: > Hi everyone, > > One quick clarification. The speakers will be announced on* August 14

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] OpenStack "S" Release Naming Preliminary Results

+1 On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Jonathan Proulx wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 08:32:38PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > > :6. Spandau loses to Solar by 195–88, loses to Springer by 125–118 > > Given this is at #6 and formal vetting is yet to come it's probably > not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Resources owned by a project/tenant are not cleaned up after that project is deleted from keystone

Wondering if heat should be performing this orchestration. Would provide for a more pluggable front end to the action set. -matt On Feb 25, 2015 2:37 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote: A few inline comments and a

Re: [openstack-dev] TC election by the numbers

On one hand, I agree a member of the TC should be a very active member of the development community. Something I have not been, much to my shame. However, there are obviously some fundamental issues in how the TC has been governing OpenStack in the past few releases. Very serious issues in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 11:51:27AM -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote: You've touched on multiple trains-of-thought that could indeed justify separate threads of their own. I agree with your read on the diverging growth rates in the strategic versus the tactical elements of the community. I