Re: [openstack-dev] Reasoning behind my vote on the Go topic

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Agreed it isn't done in uvloop. But it is done in libuv and the uvloop > devs agree it should be done. So this is the kind of thing where the > community can invest in python + C to help solve problems thought only >

Re: [openstack-dev] Reasoning behind my vote on the Go topic

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Ben Meyer wrote: > > uvloop (first commit 2015-11-01) is newer than Swift's hummingbird > (2015-04-20, based on > > https://github.com/openstack/swift/commit/a0e300df180f7f4ca64fc1eaf3601a1a73fc68cb > and github network graph) so it would

Re: [openstack-dev] Why doesn't Swift cache object data?

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:35 PM, 杨苏立 Yang Su Li yangs...@gmail.com wrote: I guess that is an excellent answer on why does swift explicitly disable object data caching at the page cache level. But my question is a bit different Why doesn't swift use memcached to cache object data? Not that it

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] Go! Swift!

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Adam Lawson alaw...@aqorn.com wrote: Chuck (and/or others who understand tor have experienced the limits of Python) I found this comment of yours incredibly intriguing: we are running out of incremental improvements that can be made with Python. Given your