On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Andrew Laski
andrew.la...@rackspace.com wrote:
Totally understand. But I would contend that it's because v3 is mostly
minor changes that we're even having this conversation.
In all fairness, that's because that's what we asked them to do when
we approved the
I think we should also acknowledge that part of the problem here is
that whilst the Hyper-V CI ran on this patch (and failed), its not
very obvious when you look at gerrit. I would say the solution to that
is to turn voting on, but the Hyper-V CI fail rate is about twice that
of Jenkins at the
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:34 AM, yunhong jiang
yunhong.ji...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Greeting,
I have some questions on the force_config_drive configuration options
and hope get some hints.
a) Why do we want this? Per my understanding, if the user want to use
the config drive,
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
So I'd saying changing it to 'disk' is out of the question unless
we unconditionally use vfat as the filesystem instead of iso9660.
So, at the moment we conflate a flag about format (iso9660 or vfat)
with a flag
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:08:59AM -0700, Michael Still wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
So I'd saying changing it to 'disk' is out of the question unless
we
Hi.
For the last day or so I've been chasing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1246201, and I think I've found
the problem... libvirt doesn't migrate devices of type cdrom, even if
they're virtual. If I change the type of the config drive to disk,
then block migration works just fine.
Does
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Additionally, the TC has laid out some (draft) graduation requirements [2]
for projects that duplicate functionality in a pre-existing project -- that
means us, since we're supplanting the old Nova
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:10 AM, CARVER, PAUL pc2...@att.com wrote:
Kyle Mestery wrote:
So, in general I don't think this will fly because it's my understanding the
OpenStack servers only test fully open source code. Allowing a third party
vendor system to run on the OpenStack servers as part of
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Matthew Gilliard
matthew.gilli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone.
wrt these bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1276203
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1272830 - I'd just like to make sure
that the approach I'm planning makes sense.
To
:
Hi Michael,
On 02 Feb 2014, at 06:19 , Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
I saw another case of the build succeeded message for a failure just
now... https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59101/ has a rebase failure
but was marked as successful.
Is this another case of hyper-v not being
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
So if nova-network doesn't go away this has implications for the V3 API as
it currently doesn't support
nova-network. I'm not sure that we have time to add support for it in
icehouse now, but if nova-network is
not
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
We are reviewing options between MySQL and MariaDB. RHEL 7 beta seems to
have MariaDB as the default MySQL-like DB.
Can someone summarise the status of the OpenStack in terms of
-What MySQL-flavor is/are
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:28 AM, John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hey Everyone,
A while back I started talking about this idea of requiring Cinder
driver contributors to run a super simple cert script (some info here:
[1]). Since then I've been playing with introduction of a
John -- I agree with you entirely here. My concern is more that I
think the CI tests need to run more frequently than weekly.
Michael
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:30 AM, John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
On Thu
You mention some concerns with processutils on that wiki page that I
was unaware of. I can't find bugs for them either. Do you have any
pointers to what is being referred to there?
Thanks,
Michael
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
I've spent some
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
The notes are from the summit discussion, and I didn't open the bugs. I'll
do that this week. Should I assign them to you?
If you assign them to me I will take a look at them.
Michael
--
Rackspace Australia
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
It would be nice to get lockutils graduated to solve some of the issues
mentioned in the oslo.db section, but I believe we do have an outstanding
question regarding its behavior without lock_path being set. I think Clint
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Another question. This patch [1] failed turbo-hipster after it was approved
but I don't know if that's a gating or just voting job, i.e. should someone
do 'reverify migrations' on that patch or just let it sit
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
[snip]
So instead of trying to fix the individual runs, because t-h runs pretty
fast, can you just fix it with bulk. It seems like the issue in a migration
taking a long time isn't a race in OpenStack, it's completely
Hi!
Sorry the slow response. I've been at a conference this week, so I'm a
bit behind. I apologise for that.
The root cause here is a failure to understand the relatively
undocumented git behaviour of zuul. We think we've now got a fix, and
will deploy it soon.
Michael
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at
apologise for this mis-vote.
Michael
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 12/30/2013 6:21 AM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi.
The purpose of this email to is apologise for some incorrect -1 review
scores which turbo hipster sent out today. I think
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 12/31/2013 3:58 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi.
So while turbo hipster is new, I've been reading every failure message
it produces to make sure its not too badly wrong. There were four
failures posted last night while I slept:
https://review.openstack.org
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:24 AM, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.org wrote:
However, there are _a lot_ of third-party test systems coming on-line,
and I'm not sure that expanding the recheck language to support ever
more complexity is a good idea. I can see how being able to say
recheck foo
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
I'd love to attend this chat, if possible. A number of the coming
on-line third-party test systems are motivated by neutron plugins. I'd
get a lot from hearing this discussion.
I've created a BoF on Monday night straight
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:24 AM, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.org wrote:
However, there are _a lot_ of third-party test systems coming on-line,
and I'm not sure that expanding the recheck language to support ever
more
Hi.
So while turbo hipster is new, I've been reading every failure message
it produces to make sure its not too badly wrong. There were four
failures posted last night while I slept:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64521
This one is a TH bug. We shouldn't be
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19 2013, Sean Dague wrote:
So please look for recent passes before +Aing anything.
What about making that automatic?
Same question for patchset that stays that for a month, finally got
approved and fails
I don't have a problem with any of these requirements, but I'd like to
explore automating the checks. Would it be possible to write a unit
test that verified this for all migrations? Then we don't need to add
it to the checklist...
Michael
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Matt Riedemann
I like this idea.
Michael
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Peter Portante
peter.a.porta...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anybody considered changing how check and gate jobs work such that
the tempest and grenade checks only run once the docs/pep8/unittests
jobs all succeed?
It seems like they
+1
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to propose that we re-add Dan Prince to the nova-core
review team.
Dan Prince has been involved with Nova since early in OpenStack's
history (Bexar timeframe). He was a member of the
I wonder how hard it would be to add bug information to gerrit to make
the state of the bug being fixed more obvious?
Just a random idea.
Michael
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I tend to follow merges and look for valuable havana
+1
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
Please respond with +1/-1, or any further comments.
+1 from me -- Matt has been helping a lot lately.
--Dan
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Clark Boylan clark.boy...@gmail.com wrote:
How do we avoid this in the future? Step one is reviewers that are
approving changes (or reverifying them) should keep an eye on the gate
queue
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Clark Boylan clark.boy...@gmail.com wrote:
How do we avoid this in the future? Step one is reviewers that are
approving changes (or reverifying them) should keep an eye on the gate
queue.
Talking on the -infra IRC channel just now, it has become clear to me
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 11/19/2013 03:46 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
As long as the metadataservice doesn't move out :) - that one I think
is pretty core and we have no native replacement [configdrive is not a
replacement :P].
Slightly off tangent
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote:
This is a follow-up to the design summit discussion about DB migrations.
There was concern about the undo-ability of some migrations. The specific
example cited was removal of a column. Could that be done with the
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
I also would not use migrate. sqlalchemy-migrate is a dead upstream and
we (OpenStack) have had to inherit it. For new projects, you should use
alembic. That's actively developed and maintained. Other OpenStack
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Johannes Erdfelt johan...@erdfelt.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
However, when I run it with medium sized (30 million instances)
databases, the change does cause a 10 minute downtime. I don't
personally think the change
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me wrote:
Johannes,
+1, purging should help here a lot.
Sure, but my point is more:
- pruning isn't done by the system automatically, so we have to
assume it never happens
- we need to have a clearer consensus about what we
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Mate Lakat mate.la...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
We are looking at config drive use cases, and saw this in the official
docs:
Do not rely on the presence of the EC2 metadata present in the config
drive (i.e., files under the ec2 directory), as this content
This is super cool. Thanks!
One piece of feedback -- would it be possible to get the results as
something other than a tarball? Downloading the entire tarball to read
one log is slightly annoying.
Thanks,
Michael
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Sreeram Yerrapragada
syerraprag...@vmware.com
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
I suggest that we just put Copyright headers back in the source files.
That will make Debian's licensecheck work fairly automatically. A single
file that tries to do exactly what debian/copyright would do seems a bit
odd.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Clark Laughlin
clark.laugh...@linaro.org wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to figure out how videomodel type='cirrus' vram='9216'
heads='1'//video makes it into the libvirt domain XML when creating a new
instance. I see where much of the content of the XML
To follow up on this, I've decided to give running a meetup a go. The
details are at http://sites.rcbops.com/lca2014_openstack/?p=38
Cheers,
Michael
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
If you're coming to linux.conf.au 2014, would you be interested
Greetings! I am currently a member of the TC, and I would like to
continue to serve.
I'm going to write this email backwards because I am aware it is quite
long. I have put what I hope to achieve on the TC at the top, but
provide background detail afterwards for those who want to dig deeper.
I am
If you're coming to linux.conf.au 2014, would you be interested in a
couple of day meetup for OpenStack developers the week after the
conference? I'm trying to judge interest before I try and get it
booked.
The timing (early January) is nice because its basically mid cycle for
Icehouse, so its a
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
Sounds great, but please commit to it asap, I nearly bought my tickets
this morning, and modifying them is expensive.
*shrug*
Its one of those things... I don't want to waste the time of a major
openstack
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2013-09-25 17:56:15 -0700:
Hi All,
TL;DR: We will be automatically identifying your flaky tempest runs, so you
just have to confirm that you hit bug x, not identify which bug you hit.
To confirm, we have a little bit over a day left for people to nominate, right?
On a personal note, I'm a little sad to see so many single candidate
elections. I guess it might indicate a strong consensus, but I worry
it encourages group think over time.
Michael
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:08 AM,
Before https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46867/ if file injection of a
mandatory file fails, nova just silently ignores the failure, which is
clearly wrong. However, that review now can't land because its
revealed another failure in the file injection code via tempest, which
is...
Should file
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Dan Wendlandt d...@nicira.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 09/20/2013 02:02 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
I couldn't agree more. In
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
++ Data backups are a solved problem, and no DB admin should trust an
application to perform its own backups.
I'm not completely sure I agree. Consider the case where a cloud with
active users undertakes an upgrade.
Done.
Cheers,
Michael
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Could one more core look at the following simple bug fix please:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46486/ - which allows the system clean up
VMs from deleted instances.
Its already got
Hi. This code has been in review since July 29, but a combination of
my focus on code reviews for others and having a baby has resulted in
it not landing. This feature is important to libvirt and closes a
critical bug we've had open way too long. The reviews:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Sam Alba sam.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
We've been working hard during the last couple of weeks with some
people. Brian Waldon helped a lot designing the Glance integration and
driver testing. Dean Troyer helped a lot on bringing Docker support in
[Concerns over review wait times in the nova project]
I think that we're also seeing the fact that nova-core's are also
developers. nova-core members have the same feature freeze deadline,
and that means that to a certain extent we need to stop reviewing in
order to get our own code ready by the
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
l...@princessleia.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Several months ago the OpenStack Infrastructure team filed a bug to
Create a git.openstack.org mirror system[0]
Does git.openstack.org replace git hub for developers cloning
repositories? Or
Hi.
I have increasing levels of concern about Havana database migrations
and I want to beg for help, especially from nova core reviewers.
Specifically, I don't think its possible to land all of the database
migrations people need before the 22 August proposal freeze. At the
moment I see 10
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
If an external proxy (like AWSOME) is what you want, one of those
already exists (at least for the EC2 API).
http://deltacloud.apache.org/
It supports EC2 on the frontend and the OpenStack compute API on the
backend.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
I would rather support solution 3: create a single, separate executable
that does those 20 things that need to be done (can be a shell script
with some logic in it), and have rootwrap call that *once*. That way you
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Atwood, Mark mark.atw...@hp.com wrote:
Hi!
While I was at the Community Leadership Summit conference this weekend, I met
the community manager for the Xen hypervisor project. He told me that there
are *no* OpenStack talks submitted to the upcoming XenCon
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
On 07/16/2013 12:07 PM, Michael Still wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
In Debian, by policy, any package should be able to be installed using
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Could you explain a bit more what could be done to fix it in an easy
way, even if it's not efficient? I understand that ALTER doesn't work
well. Though would we have the possibility to just create a new
temporary table
I'm happy to help, although I'm pretty busy...
Michael
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me wrote:
Hi Sean,
I agree to help with sqlalchemy-migrate until we remove it.
But probably there should be one more person mikal
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri,
OpenStack has a system called notifications which does what you're
looking for. I've never used it, but I am sure its documented.
Cheers,
Michael
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Qing He qing...@radisys.com wrote:
All,
Does open stack have pub/sub event service? I would like to be notified
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey
The mission statement is what we've been using for a while. The
official title is new.
Official Title: OpenStack Common Libraries
PTL: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
Mission Statement:
To produce a
+1
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi
oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp wrote:
+1
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 18:40:31 -0400
Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to propose Christopher Yoeh to be added to the nova-core team.
Christopher has been prolific in
401 - 467 of 467 matches
Mail list logo
