Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Proposing Carlos Goncalves (cgoncalves) as an Octavia core reviewer

Carlos made a significant impact with quality reviews and code contributions. I think he would make a great addition to the core team. +1 From me. /Nir On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 6:29 AM Jacky Hu wrote: > +1 > Definitely a good contributor for the octavia community. > > 发自我的 iPhone > > > 在

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Proposing Jacky Hu (dayou) as an Octavia core reviewer

+1. Well earned Jacky, Congratulations! On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Adam Harwell wrote: > +1, definitely a good contributor! Thanks especially for your work on the > dashboard! > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:09 PM German Eichberger < > german.eichber...@rackspace.com>

[openstack-dev] [Octavia] Community meeting regarding providers support

/9935153617 Regards, Nir Magnezi __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Proposing Nir Magnezi as Octavia core reviewer

>> congrats! > >> > >> On 10/05/2017 03:51 AM, German Eichberger wrote: > >> > +1 > >> > > >> > Welcome Nir, well earned. > >> > > >> > German > >> > > >> > On 10/4/17, 4:28 PM, "Michael Johnson" &l

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Nominating German Eichberger for Octavia core reviewer

I don't get a vote here, but it is indeed nice to see German back in the Octavia community. Nir On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Michael Johnson wrote: > > Hello Octavia Cores, > > I would like to nominate German Eichberger (xgerman) for reinstatement as > an > Octavia

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] - LBaaS and IPv6

Yes. On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Alex Stafeyev wrote: > Hi, > Does lbaas support LB in ipv6 network? > > tnx > > -- > Alexander Stafeyev > QE Engineer, Neutron, Openstack > Red Hat > > > __

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron-lbaas][octavia]

I would like to emphasize the importance of this issue. Currently, all te LBaaS/Octavia gates are up on running (touch wood). Nevertheless, this bug will become more apparent (aka broken gates) in the next release of tempest (if we don't merge this fix beforehand). The reason is that the issue

Re: [openstack-dev] [lbaas][octavia] suggestion for today's meeting agenda: How to make the Amphora-agent support additional Linux flavors

Hi Greg, Thanks for the replay, comments inline. On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Gregory Haynes <g...@greghaynes.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016, at 10:26 AM, Nir Magnezi wrote: > > Hello, > > Lately, I've been working on a fix[1] for the amhpora-agent, which > curre

[openstack-dev] [lbaas][octavia] suggestion for today's meeting agenda: How to make the Amphora-agent support additional Linux flavors

Hello, Lately, I've been working on a fix[1] for the amhpora-agent, which currently only support Debian based flavors such as Ubuntu. The main Issues here: 1. NIC hot plugs: Ubuntu's ethX.cfg files looks different from ifcfg-ethX files which are accepted in Linux flavors such a RHEL, CentOS and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] [lbaas] Mid-Cycle proposed for the week of August 22nd

Hi Michael, Will there be an option to participate from remote? Thanks, Nir On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Michael Johnson wrote: > Just a reminder, we have a proposed mid-cycle meeting set for the week > of August 22nd in San Antonio. > > If you would like to attend

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleO][Neutron] neutron-lbaas agent service placement

Hi Qasim, Replied inline to your non-triple-o specific related questions. Also regarding your following email, any specific reason you try to use LBaaSv1? I highly recommend that you go with LBaaSv2 (you may still choose haproxy if you wish), since LBaaSv1 is deprecated[1] and will be removed[2]