[openstack-dev] [manila] write integrity with NFS-Ganesha over CephFS

Hi Jeff, Currently, there is no open source backend in manila that provides scalable and highly-available NFS servers for dynamic cloud workloads. Manila's CephFS driver could integrate with your on-going work on active-active NFS over CephFS (with Kubernetes managing the lifecycle of

[openstack-dev] [manila]: Fwd: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Xenial PPA packages for FSALs?

nesha/libfsalproxy.so > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ganesha/libfsalgpfs.so.4 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ganesha/libfsalvfs.so.4 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ganesha/libfsalgluster.so > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ganesha/libfsalgluster.so.4 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ganesha/libfsalnull.

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] nfs-ganesha export modification issue

On Thursday, June 30, 2016 6:07 PM, Alexey Ovchinnikov wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > here I will briefly summarize an export update problem one will encounter > when using nfs-ganesha. > > While working on a driver that relies on nfs-ganesha I have discovered that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Tom Barron for core reviewer team

+1. Tom's reviews and guidance are helpful and spot-on. -Ramana On Thursday, August 4, 2016 7:52 AM, Zhongjun (A) wrote: > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Tom Barron for core reviewer > team > > > > +1 Tom will be a great addition to the core team. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila]: questions on update-access() changes

y work and need not worry about the approaches of changes a) and c). -Ramana > > > On June 2, 2016 9:30:39 AM Ramana Raja <rr...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > There are a few changes that seem to be lined up for Newton to make > > manila's >

[openstack-dev] [manila]: questions on update-access() changes

Hi, There are a few changes that seem to be lined up for Newton to make manila's share access control, update_access(), workflow better [1] -- reduce races in DB updates, avoid non-atomic state transitions, and possibly enable the workflow fit in a HA active-active manila configuration (if not

[openstack-dev] [manila] quotas per tenant/user per share type?

Hi, Can manila enforce quotas on resources for a tenant/user per share type? An example use case being, I'm a cloud operator and I want to restrict the tenant A to consume not more than 'x' GB of storage space for share type 'premium'. If such a quota mechanism does not exist, is there a plan to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] HDFS CI broken

- Original Message - > From: "Ben Swartzlander" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 9:00:06 PM > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Manila] HDFS CI broken > > The

[openstack-dev] [ceph] DevStack plugin for Ceph required for Mitaka-1 and beyond?

Hi, I was trying to figure out the state of DevStack plugin for Ceph, but couldn't find its source code and ran into the following doubt. At Mitaka 1, i.e. next week, wouldn't Ceph related Jenkins gates (e.g. Cinder's gate-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph) that still use extras.d's hook script instead of a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Two nominations for Manila Core Reviewer Team

+1 to both. - Original Message - From: Ben Swartzlander b...@swartzlander.org To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 11:53:15 PM Subject: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Two nominations for Manila Core