Steven,
This sounds like a perfect place for a cross project spec. It wouldn't have to
be a big one, but all the projects would have a chance to review and the TC
would oversee to ensure it gets proper review.
TCms, am I on point here?
--Rocky
From: Jay S. Bryant
(apologies for my pushiness, but getting all the projects using olso.log for
logging will really help the ops experience)
All projects (except maybe Swift) should be moving to use oslo.logging.
Therefore, your longterm fix is the right way to go. When you find log issues
like the one in
Morgan Fainberg [mailto:morgan.fainb...@gmail.com] on Friday, December 12, 2014
2:01 PM wrote:
On Friday, December 12, 2014, Sean Dague
s...@dague.netmailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
On 12/12/2014 01:05 PM, Maru Newby wrote:
On Dec 11, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.netjavascript:;
First, I agree that it's much friendlier to have unique security group names
and not have to use UUIDs since when there is a need for more than a default,
the Tennant admin will want to be able to easily track info related to it, plus
in the GUI, if it allows a new one to be created, it should
Hi guys,
I apologize for taking so long to get to this, but I think once we start
meeting, our momentum will build.
I'm cross posting this to dev and operators so anyone who is interested can
participate. I've set up a Doodle to vote on the first set of times (these
happen to work for me and
Thank you Stefano (and Shari and Katherine)!
I think this will help. Is there a way to add new categories? I expect that
as people start using this, more categories will be requested.
And, is there a wiki page where this info is hosted?
--Rocky
-Original Message-
From: Stefano
Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack session or the
logging session from their current joint (and conflicting) time (15:40)? QA
really would be appreciated at both. And I'd really like to be at both. I'd
say the Refstack one would go better in the debug slot, as the
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
