> On Oct 8, 2018, at 2:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> Anne Bertucio writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have had a fantastic time getting to work on the Release Management
>> team and getting to know you all through the release marketing work,
>> however, it is time for me to step down from my rol
> On Oct 3, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
> Sean Dague wrote:
>> I'd like to announce that after 4 years serving on the OpenStack
>> Technical Committee, I will not be running in this fall's
>> election. Over the last 4 years we've navigated some rough seas
>> together, including th
Hi,
We have made it to the next stage of the topic selection process for the
Forum in Sydney!
At the Forum the entire OpenStack community (users and developers) gathers
to brainstorm the requirements for the next release, gather feedback on the
past version and have strategic discussions that go
Hi Forum Brainstormers,
Wow! Some great topics in the etherpads so far. This event is going to be
amazing.
We're less than a week away now from opening the "formal submission" part
of the process.
If you haven't already, please start prioritizing the top sessions from
your list of ideas. Startin
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Shamail Tahir wrote:
> > In the past, governance has helped (on the UC WG side) to reduce
> > overlaps/duplication in WGs chartered for similar objectives. I would
> > like to understand how we will handle this (if
but perception matters.
> Hope this clarifies,
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> __________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsub
Hi everyone,
Most of the proposed/accepted Forum sessions currently have moderators but
there are six sessions that do not have a confirmed moderator yet. Please
look at the list below and let us know if you would be willing to help
moderate any of these sessions.
The topics look really interesti
. The idea is that everyone stays in openstack-dev
> for _all_ discussions (single-project as well). Only the most mundane
> but necessary emails go on per-project "business lists". So there would
> be zero point in ever subscribing to the business lists without also
> subscribing to openst
s about each project on
> the list. But there's obvious stuff that is just logistics about an
> established project team's business, and a complete waste of time to
> even have to filter by thread. We've gotten _really_ wide over the
> years. So if you ha
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time
___
we determine a
time. I will be closing the poll on Feb. 9th, 2017 @ 23:59 UTC.
Poll: http://doodle.com/poll/76bnere6ztdg7hgd
--
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time
[1]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/109622.html
or changes
pending based on feedback) in the Product WG repo. We are currently
working with the infra team to get a visualization tool deployed that shows
the status for each artifact and provides links so that people can get more
details as necessary. Could something similar be (re)us
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 05/02/2016 01:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> When will we name the P release of OpenStack? We named two releases
>> simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle. Thi
the location
is now known) we would be able to have names associated with the current
release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P). This would also allow us
to get back to only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently
have names for N, N+1, and N+2.
--
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t
/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi
Hi everyone,
I would like to announce my candidacy for OpenStack Technical Committee
member for the upcoming term.
I am currently an offering manager for OpenStack initiatives at IBM and I
have been involved in the OpenStack community since 2013. I spend most of
my time[1] in our working groups
et/
[4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Bug_Tags
[5] http://docs.openstack.org/upstream-training/
--
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Uns
to add an "official-since" into projects.yaml? The
value could tie to when the TC approves a project (since not all projects
have to adhere with the 6-month release itself).
[1]
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/projects.yaml
--
Thanks,
Shamail Ta
et diluted on the next 6 months)
Finally, as mentioned by Clint, consul does provide DNS-SD (but not
DNS-TXT) interface so using it as a backend allows us to focus on REST but
set ground work for DNS too.
>
> -Sean
>
> --
> Sean Dague
> http://dague.net
>
>
> ___
)
>>
>> __________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org
n for projects
with diverse-affiliation tag (versus those that don't have it) and make
them more "preferred" in a sense?
Thanks,
Shamail
> - Josh
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev
21 matches
Mail list logo
