Hi,
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 10:39:57AM +0800, 吕冬兵 wrote:
> Hi Stéphane,
>
> I got what you mean, I’m sure that CloudKitty can rating by event, but
> I have some other puzzles. Let me generally describe the arch of
> Bilean first
>
> [events] <—> [rating] <—> [billing]
>
> When event coming
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 09:50:02AM +0800, 吕冬兵 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry to see this discussion so late:). Thanks for attention.
>
> I don't oppose to contribute to add trigger-based solution to
> CloudKitty, I just want to know if it's possible to support
> trigger-based for CloudKitty based on
Hi,
I would like to continue the discussion that started in the [review][1]
for the Big-Tent integration of the project Bilean.
In the [review][1] the Bilean team stated that a new project was needed
to overcome limitations of existing components.
In this thread, I would like to have an open
Hi everyone,
I'm announcing my candidacy for PTL of the CloudKitty team during the
Newton
cycle.
Some of the features and improvements of the project I envisioned are
not yet
ready and contributed and there is more to come. But due to lack of
contributor's time we'll need more time to make
Hi,
Most of the guys are currently in vacations, we are canceling meetings
for the next 2 weeks. We'll be back at the beginning of January.
Happy holidays
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Hi,
As you might already know we are using the independent release which
means that we can release whenever we want.
Like we discussed during the Tokyo summit our goal is to release a
couple versions before the Mitaka release which should correspond to the
1.0 version.
Every version will
Hi,
We're having more and more contributors to the CloudKitty project, which
is really nice. But sadly we hardly see new faces at the meetings.
This mail is just to make a quick check to find out what's the reason
behind that.
Is this because the meeting hours are hard to attend? I know that
Hi,
Just a quick note to let you know that we are changing CloudKitty
release type. We used independent one which forbids us of having stable
branches and being part of the OpenStack release. We already discussed
it during the OpenStack summit in Tokyo and it was pretty clear that we
needed to
Hi,
We didn't get your opinion Guillaume, are you approving it?
Cheers
- Forwarded message from Stéphane Albert <sheeprine...@nullplace.com> -
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:51:42 +0100
From: Stéphane Albert <sheeprine...@nullplace.com>
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack
Hi Julien,
You'll find attached to this mail two dump files.
gnocchi_resource.txt is an example of resource requests and responses
from gnocchi.
gnocchi_measure.txt an example of a timeframe request.
Metric (vcpus) measure
==
Data stored by ceilometer with default
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 05:04:02PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26 2015, Stéphane Albert wrote:
>
> Here a first reply about resource handling.
>
> > Resource data
> > =
> > Duplicated resource informations from ceilometer, only revision ti
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 05:31:38PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26 2015, Stéphane Albert wrote:
>
> > I'll open a bug with a full history dump, sometime it's due to the host
> > changing (flapping) from name to hash, this might be due to
> > cei
on most
openstack channels too, I'm in UTC+1 timezone.
Hoping we can find a solution and ship gnocchi support in the next
CloudKitty version, which is pretty much ready.
Cheers
Stéphane Albert - 05 82 95 65 36
Objectif Libre www.objectif-libre.com
Infrastructure et Formations Linux
Hi,
Some people in the cloudkitty-core group are not active anymore. They
haven't produced a single contribution during the last cycle. Here is
the list of the two people:
- Adrian Turjak
- François Magimel
I think we should remove them from the group. We've got new faces in the
project, let's
Hi,
I'm back from Japan, we'll start having regular meetings again.
Here's today's agenda:
* New contributions
* Gnocchi support
* Pending reviews
* Road to version 0.5
* Next version goals
During this meeting we need to iron out remaining bugs to prepare
release 0.5. As
Hi,
The summit is coming and most people are already in Japan. This makes
the organisation of meetings pretty difficult.
We'll cancel this week's meeting and next weeks too as most of the
contributors will be in Tokyo talking CloudKitty's future.
We'll resume normal schedule after the summit.
Hi everyone,
As you might have guessed based on the title CloudKitty is now part of
the Big Tent. It's not new as the decision was taken one week ago, but
some people might not be aware of this.
Thanks to our Big Tent integration we are lucky enough to get two design
summit slots.
The first
Hi,
Most of the people involved in the project won't be able to attend
today's meeting. Meeting is canceled.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
18 matches
Mail list logo
