Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][neutron] Intel NFV CI voting permission in Neutron

Hi Ihar et al, Apologies for late reply. We were fighting couple of issues with the CI in last couple of days. The networking problem mentioned by Ihar was one of them. We're running fine as of yesterday [1]. To stay on the safe side let's wait a few days so CI proves stable before making it

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra][neutron] Intel NFV CI voting permission in Neutron

;voting permission in Neutron > >On 2016-11-14 10:44:42 + (+0000), Znoinski, Waldemar wrote: >> I would like to acquire voting (+/-1 Verified) permission for our >> Intel NFV CI. >[...] > >The requested permission is configured by addition to >https://revi

[openstack-dev] [infra][neutron] Intel NFV CI voting permission in Neutron

Hi Neutron, Infra Cores et al, I would like to acquire voting (+/-1 Verified) permission for our Intel NFV CI. 1. It's running on Neutron changes since Q1'2015. 2. Wiki [1]. 3. It's using openstack-infra/puppet-openstackci [2] with Zuul 2.1.1 for last 8 months: zuul, gearman, Jenkins, nodepool,

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra][nova][tempest][qa][infra] NUMA topology, cpu pinning, hugepages tempest tests upstream or plugin

I'd like to invite everybody to collaborate around nfv feature testing in OpenStack in etherpad [1]. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nfv-tests From: Znoinski, Waldemar [mailto:waldemar.znoin...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 12:26 PM To: openstack...@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova-MultiJob CI (non-voting) request to comment

Hi Lenny, Matt et al, We've touched the same NFV features testing topic on live-migration meeting today and apart a ML [1] post we'd invite everybody to collaborate around nfv tests in etherpad [2]. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-November/106949.html [2]

[openstack-dev] [openstack-infra][nova][tempest][qa][infra] NUMA topology, cpu pinning, hugepages tempest tests upstream or plugin

Hi all, Due to recent discussions around Enhanced Platform Awareness (EPA) and their testing in OpenStack thinking was started to take what Intel NFV 3rd party CI [1] runs at this moment and merge some/all into upstream Tempest. Currently intel-nfv-ci-tests is a Tempest plugin [2] [3] and it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Mirror issues with Intel NFV CI?

age- >From: Znoinski, Waldemar >Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 9:27 PM >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) ><openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> >Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [nova] Mirror issues with Intel NFV CI? > >Hi Ma

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Mirror issues with Intel NFV CI?

Hi Matt, Introduction of using subnetpools in devstack [1] is causing issues like 'Connection to proxy timed out. ' in our setup. We are working on it and will update ML soon. Thanks for pinging. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356026/ >-Original Message- >From: Matt

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] Intel NFV CI voting permission

We’ll disable testing on nova stable/liberty till I have a moment to look into the problem(s) properly – should happen in next few days. CI had some trouble on stable/mitaka for a moment couple of weeks back but it’s fixed since. From: Znoinski, Waldemar Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 9:17 PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] Intel NFV CI voting permission

m.com<mailto:mzoel...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 3:15 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] Intel NFV CI voting permission On 03.08.2016 22:02, Znoinski, Waldemar wrote: > Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] Intel NFV CI voting permission

Wednesday, August 3, 2016 8:28 PM >To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] Intel NFV CI voting permission > >On 8/3/2016 8:18 AM, Znoinski, Waldemar wrote: >> [WZ] Hi Matt, do we need, a Gerrit-style, +2 on that from someone?

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] Intel NFV CI voting permission

>-Original Message- >From: Znoinski, Waldemar [mailto:waldemar.znoin...@intel.com] >Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 6:52 PM >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) ><openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [no

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] Intel NFV CI voting permission

>-Original Message- >From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] >Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 6:37 PM >To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] Intel NFV CI voting permission > >On 7/29/2016 10:47 AM, Zno

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] Intel NFV CI voting permission

o: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] Intel NFV CI voting permission > >On 7/21/2016 5:38 AM, Znoinski, Waldemar wrote: >> Hi Nova cores et al, >> >> >> >> I would like to acquire voting (+/-1 Verified) per

[openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] Intel NFV CI voting permission

Hi Nova cores et al, I would like to acquire voting (+/-1 Verified) permission for our Intel NFV CI. 1. It's running since Q1'2015. 2. Wiki [1]. 3. It's using openstack-infra/puppet-openstackci with Zuul 2.1.1 for last

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Intel NFV CI failing all shelve/unshelve tests

Hi all, I'll disable the shelve/unshelve failing tests in Intel NFV CI for the time being till we have clarity on the problem. Stephen Finucane will be working on that in next week or so. >-Original Message- >From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com] >Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] resolving issues with Intel NFV CI

The issue is now resolved. Apparently the job wasn't registered with gearman server as there weren't any slaves available in Jenkins to run it at the time of zuul restart (as some old nodepool nodes were left over and no new VMs were spawned). From: Znoinski, Waldemar [mailto:waldemar.znoin

[openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] resolving issues with Intel NFV CI

Hi all, There is an issue with jobs under Intel NFV CI not being registered. The issue is currently being investigated. ThirdPartySystems Wiki was updated. Updates to follow. Waldemar Znoinski -- Intel Research and Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the Intel SRIOV CI running and if so, what does it test?

>-Original Message- >From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] >Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 4:22 PM >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >Cc: Feng, Shaohe >Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

>-Original Message- >From: Monty Taylor [mailto:mord...@inaugust.com] >Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 3:27 PM >To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures >missed a regression, why? > >On 03/25/2016 03:52 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

Hi Jay, Matt, Levi et al, The Intel NFV CI problems were fixed last week. Also, I think if the CIs would have voting right it would attract more attention. I'd be happy to work with OpenStack Infra team on getting our NFV CI the voting level/rights. To do it right, though, it'd be great to

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] gerrit/git review problem error code 10061

Hi Baohua If you have a socks proxy to hand then you could check ‘tsocks’ - http://tsocks.sourceforge.net/ or check your distro’s package manager. It’s quite ‘transparent’ proxying (over socks 4 or 5) of pretty much any process you run with it, i.e.: tsocks scp -P29418

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Try to introduce RFC mechanism to CI.

>-Original Message- >From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org] >Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 1:17 PM >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Try to introduce RFC mechanism to

[openstack-dev] [nova][infra] Intel NFV CI, testing hugepages, numa topology, cpu pinning

Hi cores et al, As discussed briefly with Jay Pipes in Vancouver, we were about to provide CI and tests for features such as: hugepages, cpu pinning, numa topology. We since worked on NFV CI here at Intel. The work on the CI and tests is now completed. A few details about the CI and tests. *

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra][Infra][Neutron] Nominating intel-networking-ci for voting rights

/neutron/tree/doc/source/policies/thirdparty-ci.rst From: Znoinski, Waldemar Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 9:58 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra][Infra][Neutron] Nominating intel

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra][Infra][Neutron] Nominating intel-networking-ci for voting rights

] [openstack-infra][Infra][Neutron] Nominating intel-networking-ci for voting rights On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Znoinski, Waldemar waldemar.znoin...@intel.commailto:waldemar.znoin...@intel.com wrote: Hi Kyle and Neutron Cores, I would like to nominate Intel-Networking-CI (https

[openstack-dev] [openstack-infra][Infra][Neutron] Nominating intel-networking-ci for voting rights

Hi Kyle and Neutron Cores, I would like to nominate Intel-Networking-CI (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/Intel-Networking-CI) to have voting (non-gating) rights. It's been commenting on each proposed patch-set in Neutron since Feb 10 '15: