Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - L3 flavors and issues with usecases for multiple L3 backends

2016-02-02 Thread rzang
What advantage can we get from putting multiple drivers into one flavor over strictly limit one flavor one driver (or whatever it is called). Thanks, Rui -- Original -- From: "Kevin Benton";; Send time: Wednesday, Feb 3, 2016 8:55 AM To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - L3 flavors and issues with usecasesfor multiple L3 backends

2016-02-02 Thread rzang
routers). On Feb 2, 2016 18:22, "rzang" <rui.z...@foxmail.com> wrote: What advantage can we get from putting multiple drivers into one flavor over strictly limit one flavor one driver (or whatever it is called). Thanks, Rui -- Original -- From

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - L3 flavors and issues with use casesfor multiple L3 backends

2016-02-01 Thread rzang
Hi Kevin, I am probably talking about non-sense. But will we allow chaining routers with different flavors? Taking it to the real world, if a router failed to attach to the external network in your description, it may probably need another gateway device which can do the bridging.