Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling

2014-04-10 Thread zhangyu (AI)
+1 A reference case is that, in an operating system like Linux, hardware drivers only abstract hardware devices into manageable resources with standard interfaces. Then the kernel takes the job to allocate resources, map and schedule workload onto them, and so on. In OpenStack, projects for res

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-06 Thread zhangyu (AI)
[Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection On 6 March 2014 08:50, zhangyu (AI) wrote: > It seems to be an interesting idea. In fact, a China-based public > IaaS, QingCloud, has provided a similar feature to their virtual > servers. Within 2 hours after a virtual server i

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] RFC - using Gerrit for Nova Blueprint review & approval

2014-03-06 Thread zhangyu (AI)
This is TRULY a constructive suggestion. Time and again people have good ideas, but fail to make them high-quality BPs, even being familiar with code base. The major reason lies in lacking of design experiences. Such a Gerrit-based design iteration will make the design and decision process more

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-06 Thread zhangyu (AI)
protection On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:13 PM, John Garbutt mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com>> wrote: On 6 March 2014 08:50, zhangyu (AI) mailto:zhangy...@huawei.com>> wrote: > It seems to be an interesting idea. In fact, a China-based public IaaS, > QingCloud, has provided a similar

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-06 Thread zhangyu (AI)
It seems to be an interesting idea. In fact, a China-based public IaaS, QingCloud, has provided a similar feature to their virtual servers. Within 2 hours after a virtual server is deleted, the server owner can decide whether or not to cancel this deletion and re-cycle that "deleted" virtual serv

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] non-persistent storage(after stopping VM, data will be rollback automatically), do you think we shoud introduce this feature?

2014-03-03 Thread zhangyu (AI)
Agree. Snapshot seems to be a nature solution for it. -Original Message- From: Joe Gordon [mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 11:26 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: Luohao (brian) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] n

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Nova]Do you think volume force delete operation should not apply to the volume being used?

2014-02-25 Thread zhangyu (AI)
bry...@us.ibm.com> All the world's a stage and most of us are desperately unrehearsed. -- Sean O'Casey -------- From:"zhangyu (AI)" mailto:zhangy...@huawei.com>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Nova]Do you think volume force delete operation should not apply to the volume being used?

2014-02-25 Thread zhangyu (AI)
] [Cinder] [Nova]Do you think volume force delete operation should not apply to the volume being used? I thinkforce delete = nova detach volume,then cinder delete volume Volume status in db shoud be modified after nova detach volume. Thanks! From: zhangyu (AI) [mailto:zhangy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Nova]Do you think volume force delete operation should not apply to the volume being used?

2014-02-25 Thread zhangyu (AI)
If I understand your question correctly, the case you describe should be like the following: Assume we have created both an instance and a volume, then we try to attach that volume to the instance. Before that operation is completed (the status of the volume is "attaching" now), for whatever r

[openstack-dev] 答复: [OpenStack-dev][Nova] Can we add one configuration item for cache-using in libvirt/hypervisor?

2014-02-23 Thread zhangyu (AI)
Sure, hard-coding seems weird… However, a global configuration here dominates all domains. It might be a little too strong in cases in which we want to apply various configurations to different domains. Could we add any new attributes in the info for creating a domain for this? Or any other su