Thanks for the feedback!
I need to look closer to Cinder Agent specs.
Walter,
Hope, I could help you and Duncan with making this.
Regards,
Ivan Kolodyazhny
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:32 AM, Mathieu Gagné mga...@iweb.com wrote:
On 2014-09-16 7:03 PM, Walter A. Boring IV wrote:
The upside to
On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/16/2014 11:55 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
Based on my reading of the wiki page about this it sounds like it should
be a sub-project of the Storage program. While it is targeted for use
by multiple projects, it's pretty
+1 to Doug's comments.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/16/2014 11:55 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
Based on my reading of the wiki page about this it sounds like it should
be a
Thanks a lot for a comments!
As discussed in IRC (#openstack-cinder), moving Brick to Oslo or Stackforge
isn't the best solution.
We're moving on making Cinder Agent (or Cinder Storage agent) [1] based on
Brick code instead of making Brick as a separate python library used in
Cinder and Nova.
Thanks for the effort Ivan. Your interest in brick is also helping us
push forward with the idea of the agent that we've had in mind for quite
some time.
For those interested, I have created an etherpad that discusses some of
the requirements and design decisions/discussion on the
On Sep 17, 2014 3:48 PM, Walter A. Boring IV walter.bor...@hp.com wrote:
Thanks for the effort Ivan. Your interest in brick is also helping us
push forward with the idea of the agent that we've had in mind for quite
some time.
For those interested, I have created an etherpad that discusses
On 09/16/2014 11:55 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
Based on my reading of the wiki page about this it sounds like it should
be a sub-project of the Storage program. While it is targeted for use
by multiple projects, it's pretty specific to interacting with Cinder,
right? If so, it seems like Oslo
Originally I wrote the connector side of brick to be the LUN discovery
shared code between Cinder and Nova.
I tried to make a patch in Havana that would remove do this but it
didn't make it in.
The upside to brick not making it in Nova is that it has given us some
time to rethink things a
On 2014-09-16 7:03 PM, Walter A. Boring IV wrote:
The upside to brick not making it in Nova is that it has given us some
time to rethink things a bit. What I would actually
like to see happen now is to create a new cinder/storage agent instead
of just a brick library. The agent would run on
