[Adding openstack-dev to this thread. For those of you just joining… We
started kicking around ideas for how we might integrate a special-purpose VM
placement engine into Congress.]
Kudva: responses inline.
On Dec 16, 2014, at 6:25 AM, Prabhakar Kudva
mailto:ku...@us.ibm.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I
Tim,
I read the conversation thread below and this got me interested as it relates
to our discussion we had in the Policy Summit (mid cycle meet up) held in Palo
Alto a few months ago.
This relates to our project – Nova Solver Scheduler, which I had talked about
at the Policy summit. Please
To add to what I mentioned below… We from the Solver Scheduler team are a small
team here at Cisco, trying to drive this project and slowly adding more complex
use cases for scheduling and policy–driven placements.We would really love
to have some real contributions from everyone in the comm
Hi all,
Responses inline.
On Dec 16, 2014, at 10:57 PM,
mailto:ruby.krishnasw...@orange.com>>
mailto:ruby.krishnasw...@orange.com>> wrote:
Hi Tim & All
@Tim: I did not reply to openstack-dev. Do you think we could have an openstack
list specific for “congress” to which anybody may subscribe?
Hi Yathi,
Thanks for the reminder about the nova solver scheduler. It’s definitely a
cool idea to look at integrating the two systems!
Ramki is definitely involved in this discussion. We thought placement was a
good first example of a broad class of problems that a linear solver could help
a
v"
> , "Gokul B Kandiraju"
>
> Envoyé: Jeudi 18 Décembre 2014 18:24:59
> Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Re: Placement and Scheduling via
> Policy
>
> Hi all,
>
> Responses inline.
>
> On Dec 16, 2014, at 10:57 PM,
> mailto:ruby.krishna
