Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [FFE] Unlock Settings Tab

2016-03-28 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
​Guys, you are awesome. Thank you all very much.​ Vladimir Kozhukalov On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Alexey Shtokolov wrote: > Fuelers! > > I'm glad to announce that all patches [0] were merged! > > Many thanks to all of you who help us to make Fuel more flexible and > unlimited. > > Special

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] [FFE] Unlock Settings Tab

2016-03-28 Thread Alexey Shtokolov
Fuelers! I'm glad to announce that all patches [0] were merged! Many thanks to all of you who help us to make Fuel more flexible and unlimited. Special thanks to our code and design reviewers: Igor Kalnitsky, Sergii Golovatiuk, Vitaly Kramskikh. And especially to the Team: Bulat Gaifullin, Ilya

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [FFE] Unlock Settings Tab

2016-03-25 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Granted. New deadline is 21:00 UTC 03/28/2016. Vladimir Kozhukalov On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Alexey Shtokolov wrote: > Fuelers! > > > We are very close to landing our feature "Unlock Settings Tab". But we > still have a set of reviews [0] to be merged due to several reasons (incl. > the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [FFE] Unlock Settings Tab

2016-03-25 Thread Alexey Shtokolov
Fuelers! We are very close to landing our feature "Unlock Settings Tab". But we still have a set of reviews [0] to be merged due to several reasons (incl. the migration to python27-db gates on OpenStack Infra). I would like to request extra time till Monday to land them. [0] - https://goo.gl/kS

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [FFE] Unlock Settings Tab

2016-03-14 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
Thanks for working this out! Confirming that task history remains included in the scope of this FFE until the merge deadline, March 24. On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:48:51PM +0200, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > Hey Dmitry, > > I confirm that we agreed on feature design, and you can proceed with > granting

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [FFE] Unlock Settings Tab

2016-03-11 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Hey Dmitry, I confirm that we agreed on feature design, and you can proceed with granting exception. ,- Igor On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Alexey Shtokolov wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > We've reached the design consensus with Igor today. Could you please remove > the conditional status of the FFE

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [FFE] Unlock Settings Tab

2016-03-11 Thread Alexey Shtokolov
Hi Dmitry, We've reached the design consensus with Igor today. Could you please remove the conditional status of the FFE request? As agreed: the merge deadline is March 24. -- WBR, Alexey Shtokolov 2016-03-11 2:27 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Borodaenko : > Granted. Design consensus deadline for the task h

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [FFE] Unlock Settings Tab

2016-03-10 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
Granted. Design consensus deadline for the task history part of this feature is extended to March 11. This does not change the merge deadline for other parts of this feature, which is still March 24. -- Dmitry Borodaenko On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:02:52AM +0300, Alexey Shtokolov wrote: > Dmitry

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [FFE] Unlock Settings Tab

2016-03-10 Thread Alexey Shtokolov
Dmitry, We are really close to have the consensus, but we need one more meeting with Fuel-Python Component Lead Igor Kalnitsky to make the final decision. All patches [0] are on review. The meeting is scheduled for tomorrow (03/11 1:30pm CET). Could you please grant us one more day for it? [0] -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [FFE] Unlock Settings Tab

2016-03-03 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
Granted, merge deadline March 24, task history part of the feature is to be excluded from this exception grant unless a consensus is reached by March 10. Relevant part of the meeting log starts at: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fuel/2016/fuel.2016-03-03-16.00.log.html#l-198 -- Dmitry B

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [FFE] Unlock Settings Tab

2016-03-02 Thread Vitaly Kramskikh
Oh, so there is a spec. I was worried that this patch has "WIP-no-bprint-assigned-yet" string in the commit message, so I thought there is no spec for it. So the commit message should be updated to avoid such confusion. It's really good I've seen this spec. There are plans to overhaul UI data form

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [FFE] Unlock Settings Tab

2016-03-02 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Vitaly Thanks for bringing this up. Actually the spec has been on review for almost 2 weeks: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/282695/. Essentially, this is not introducing new DSL but replacing the existing one with more powerful extendable language which is being actively developed within OpenSta

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [FFE] Unlock Settings Tab

2016-03-01 Thread Vitaly Kramskikh
I think it's not a part of best practices to introduce changes like https://review.openstack.org/#/c/279714/ (adding yet another DSL to the project) without a blueprint and review and discussion of the spec. 2016-03-02 2:19 GMT+07:00 Alexey Shtokolov : > Fuelers, > > I would like to request a fea

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] [FFE] Unlock Settings Tab

2016-03-01 Thread Alexey Shtokolov
Fuelers, I would like to request a feature freeze exception for "Unlock settings tab" feature [0] This feature being combined with Task-based deployment [1] and LCM-readiness for Fuel deployment tasks [2] unlocks Basic LCM in Fuel. We conducted a thorough redesign of this feature and splitted it