Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel-dev-tools repo

2015-03-27 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
IIRC in this thread we agreed to use separate core groups for different repositories http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-January/055111.html Why not follow that approach in this case? > 27 бер. 201

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel-dev-tools repo

2015-03-27 Thread Przemyslaw Kaminski
Sorry, I meant [2] https://github.com/CGenie/fuel-utils/ P. On 03/27/2015 08:34 AM, Przemyslaw Kaminski wrote: > Hello, > > In accordance with the consensus that was reached on the ML I've set up > the fuel-dev-tools repository [1]. It will be the target repo to merge > my 2 private repos [2] a

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel-dev-tools repo

2015-03-27 Thread Przemyslaw Kaminski
Hello, In accordance with the consensus that was reached on the ML I've set up the fuel-dev-tools repository [1]. It will be the target repo to merge my 2 private repos [2] and [3] (I don't think it's necessary to set up 2 different repos for this now). The core reviewers are the fuel-core group.