Hello All,
I'm writing to notify you of the approach the Glance community has decided to
take for doing functional API. Also, I'm writing to solicit your feedback on
this approach in the light of cross-project API consistency.
At the Atlanta Summit, the Glance team has discussed introducing fun
Hello Hemanth,
Thanks for your summary, and raise it up in ML.
All of them are sensible to me, there is only one concern from
implementation perspective for me like to get folks notice.
If we follow 'POST /images/{image_id}/actions/{action_type}' approach,
I think we will hard to write common co
On 05/30/2014 02:22 PM, Hemanth Makkapati wrote:
> Hello All,
> I'm writing to notify you of the approach the Glance community has
> decided to take for doing functional API. Also, I'm writing to solicit
> your feedback on this approach in the light of cross-project API
> consistency.
>
> At the
I will provide a little more context for the TC audience. I asked Hemanth
to tag this message [TC] because at the Juno summit in the cross-project
track there was discussion of cross-project api consistency [1]. The main
outcome of that meeting was that "TC should recommend API conventions via
open
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 18:22 +, Hemanth Makkapati wrote:
> Hello All,
> I'm writing to notify you of the approach the Glance community has
> decided to take for doing functional API. Also, I'm writing to
> solicit your feedback on this approach in the light of cross-project
> API consistency.
>
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 05/30/2014 02:22 PM, Hemanth Makkapati wrote:
> > Hello All,
> > I'm writing to notify you of the approach the Glance community has
> > decided to take for doing functional API. Also, I'm writing to solicit
> > your feedback on this approac
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>
>> On 05/30/2014 02:22 PM, Hemanth Makkapati wrote:
>> > Hello All,
>> > I'm writing to notify you of the approach the Glance community has
>> > decided to take for doing functional API. Als
us accordingly.
cheers,
brian
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86938/
[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Glance-deactivate-image
From: Jay Pipes [jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 7:15 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questi
I think the tasks stuff is something different, though. A task is a
(potentially) long-running operation. So it would be possible for an action
to result in the creation of a task. As the proposal stands today, the
actions we've been looking at are an alternative to the document-oriented
PATCH HTTP
*From:* Jay Pipes [jaypi...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 10, 2014 7:15 PM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC] Glance Functional API and
Cross-project API Consistency
On 06/11/2014 02:34 AM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
I think the tasks stuff is something different, though. A task is a
(potentially) long-running operation. So it would be possible for an
action to result in the creation of a task. As the proposal stands
today, the actions we've been looking at are
11 matches
Mail list logo
