On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:58:37AM -0700, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:07:30AM -0500, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/03/15 15:06 -1000, John Bresnahan wrote:
FWIW I agree with #3 and #4 but not #1 and #2. Spelling is an easy enough
thing to get right and speaks to the
On 13/03/15 10:36 +0100, Gorka Eguileor wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:58:37AM -0700, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:07:30AM -0500, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/03/15 15:06 -1000, John Bresnahan wrote:
FWIW I agree with #3 and #4 but not #1 and #2. Spelling is an easy
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:07:30AM -0500, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/03/15 15:06 -1000, John Bresnahan wrote:
FWIW I agree with #3 and #4 but not #1 and #2. Spelling is an easy enough
thing to get right and speaks to the quality standard to which the product
is held even in commit messages
On 11/03/15 15:06 -1000, John Bresnahan wrote:
FWIW I agree with #3 and #4 but not #1 and #2. Spelling is an easy
enough thing to get right and speaks to the quality standard to which
the product is held even in commit messages and comments (consider the
'broken window theory'). Of course
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:07:30AM -0500, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/03/15 15:06 -1000, John Bresnahan wrote:
FWIW I agree with #3 and #4 but not #1 and #2. Spelling is an easy enough
thing to get right and speaks to the quality standard to which the product
is held even in commit messages
On 3/12/15, 09:26, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:07:30AM -0500, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/03/15 15:06 -1000, John Bresnahan wrote:
FWIW I agree with #3 and #4 but not #1 and #2. Spelling is an easy
enough
thing to get right and speaks to the
+2A :P (Daniel and Ian)
Thanks,
-Nikhil
From: Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:59 AM
To: Daniel P. Berrange; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance
FWIW I agree with #3 and #4 but not #1 and #2. Spelling is an easy
enough thing to get right and speaks to the quality standard to which
the product is held even in commit messages and comments (consider the
'broken window theory'). Of course everyone makes mistakes (I am a
terrible speller)
Hi all,
Following the code reviews lately I've noticed that we (the fan club seems to
be growing on weekly basis) have been growing culture of nitpicking [1] and
bikeshedding [2][3] over almost every single change.
Seriously my dear friends, following things are not worth of -1 vote if even
a
@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nitpicking in code reviews
FWIW I agree with #3 and #4 but not #1 and #2. Spelling is an easy
enough thing to get right and speaks to the quality standard to which
the product is held even in commit messages and comments (consider the
'broken
10 matches
Mail list logo
