Hi Brian,
Firstly, thanks for all your great work here!
Some feedback:
1) Is there a clash with existing user properties?
For currently deployed systems a user may have an existing property 'foo:
bar'.
If we restrict property access (by virtue of allowing only owner_xxx)
can the user update th
v] [Glance] property protections -- final call for
comments
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:56 AM,
mailto:stuart.mcla...@hp.com>> wrote:
Hi Brian,
Firstly, thanks for all your great work here!
Some feedback:
1) Is there a clash with existing user properties?
For currently deployed systems a
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:56 AM, wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Firstly, thanks for all your great work here!
>
> Some feedback:
>
> 1) Is there a clash with existing user properties?
>
> For currently deployed systems a user may have an existing property 'foo:
> bar'.
> If we restrict property access (b
Hi Brian,
Firstly, thanks for all your great work here!
Some feedback:
1) Is there a clash with existing user properties?
For currently deployed systems a user may have an existing property 'foo: bar'.
If we restrict property access (by virtue of allowing only owner_xxx)
can the user update th
After lots of discussion, I think we've come to a consensus on what property
protections should look like in Glance. Please reply with comments!
The blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/api-v2-property-protection
The full specification:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Glan
