Thomas Hervé wrote on 03.10.2013 09:59:02:
> From: Thomas Hervé
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
,
> Date: 03.10.2013 10:01
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Autoscale and load balancers
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Thomas
Spatzier > wrote:
>
On 02/10/13 16:06, Thomas Hervé wrote:
Hi all,
There is a small but important part of the autoscale design described in
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/AutoScaling that we'd like to
discuss to make sure everybody is on the same page. Namely, the
relationship between an autoscaling group and
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
A way to achieve the same behavior as you suggest but less verbose would be
> to use relationships in HOT. We had some discussion about relationships
> earlier this year and in other contexts, but this would fit here very well.
> And I think
Thomas Hervé wrote on 02.10.2013 17:06:48:
> From: Thomas Hervé
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
,
> Date: 02.10.2013 17:09
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Autoscale and load balancers
>
> Hi all,
>
> There is a small but important part of the autoscale des
Hi all,
There is a small but important part of the autoscale design described in
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/AutoScaling that we'd like to discuss
to make sure everybody is on the same page. Namely, the relationship
between an autoscaling group and a load balancer.
In the current system,
