Re: [openstack-dev] [Interop-wg] [QA] [PTG] [Interop] [Designate] [Heat] [TC]: QA PTG Summary- Interop test for adds-on project

2018-03-09 Thread Zane Bitter
On 08/03/18 19:31, Doug Hellmann wrote: If these new plugins might contain "candidate" tests and all tests are potentially candidates, how are these new repos different from the existing repos that already contain all of the tests? We have to allow candidate tests because otherwise there's a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Interop-wg] [QA] [PTG] [Interop] [Designate] [Heat] [TC]: QA PTG Summary- Interop test for adds-on project

2018-03-09 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-03-08 15:51:05 -0500: >> On 08/03/18 12:57, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> > Why would the repos be owned by anyone other than the original project >> > team? >> >> A few reasons I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Interop-wg] [QA] [PTG] [Interop] [Designate] [Heat] [TC]: QA PTG Summary- Interop test for adds-on project

2018-03-09 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:34 AM, Rico Lin wrote: > >> >> Why would the repos be owned by anyone other than the original project >> team? >> > For normal tempest tests, which owned and maintained by original projects. > I think there were discussions in that PTG QA

Re: [openstack-dev] [Interop-wg] [QA] [PTG] [Interop] [Designate] [Heat] [TC]: QA PTG Summary- Interop test for adds-on project

2018-03-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-03-08 15:51:05 -0500: > On 08/03/18 12:57, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Why would the repos be owned by anyone other than the original project > > team? > > A few reasons I think it makes sense in this instance: > > * Not every set of trademark tests will

Re: [openstack-dev] [Interop-wg] [QA] [PTG] [Interop] [Designate] [Heat] [TC]: QA PTG Summary- Interop test for adds-on project

2018-03-08 Thread Zane Bitter
On 08/03/18 12:57, Doug Hellmann wrote: Why would the repos be owned by anyone other than the original project team? A few reasons I think it makes sense in this instance: * Not every set of trademark tests will necessarily belong to a single project. Tempest itself is an example of this -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Interop-wg] [QA] [PTG] [Interop] [Designate] [Heat] [TC]: QA PTG Summary- Interop test for adds-on project

2018-03-08 Thread Rico Lin
> > Why would the repos be owned by anyone other than the original project > team? > For normal tempest tests, which owned and maintained by original projects. I think there were discussions in that PTG QA session about interop tests should be maintained by QA team. > In the new resolution, we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Interop-wg] [QA] [PTG] [Interop] [Designate] [Heat] [TC]: QA PTG Summary- Interop test for adds-on project

2018-03-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-03-08 12:45:11 -0500: > On 07/03/18 08:44, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > I mean i am all ok with separate plugin which is more easy for QA team > > but ownership to QA is kind of going to same direction(QA team > > maintaining interop ads-on tests) in more

Re: [openstack-dev] [Interop-wg] [QA] [PTG] [Interop] [Designate] [Heat] [TC]: QA PTG Summary- Interop test for adds-on project

2018-03-08 Thread Zane Bitter
On 07/03/18 08:44, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: I mean i am all ok with separate plugin which is more easy for QA team but ownership to QA is kind of going to same direction(QA team maintaining interop ads-on tests) in more difficult way. After reading this and the logs from the QA meeting,[1] I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Interop-wg] [QA] [PTG] [Interop] [Designate] [Heat] [TC]: QA PTG Summary- Interop test for adds-on project

2018-03-07 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:15 PM, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:42 PM Ghanshyam Mann > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> QA had discussion in Dublin PTG about interop adds-on tests location. >> First of all thanks all

Re: [openstack-dev] [Interop-wg] [QA] [PTG] [Interop] [Designate] [Heat] [TC]: QA PTG Summary- Interop test for adds-on project

2018-03-07 Thread Andrea Frittoli
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:42 PM Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > Hi All, > > QA had discussion in Dublin PTG about interop adds-on tests location. > First of all thanks all (specially markvoelker, dhellmann, mugsie) for > joining the sessions. and I am glad we conclude the