On 08/03/18 19:31, Doug Hellmann wrote:
If these new plugins might contain "candidate" tests and all tests
are potentially candidates, how are these new repos different from
the existing repos that already contain all of the tests?
We have to allow candidate tests because otherwise there's a
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-03-08 15:51:05 -0500:
>> On 08/03/18 12:57, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> > Why would the repos be owned by anyone other than the original project
>> > team?
>>
>> A few reasons I
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:34 AM, Rico Lin wrote:
>
>>
>> Why would the repos be owned by anyone other than the original project
>> team?
>>
> For normal tempest tests, which owned and maintained by original projects.
> I think there were discussions in that PTG QA
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-03-08 15:51:05 -0500:
> On 08/03/18 12:57, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Why would the repos be owned by anyone other than the original project
> > team?
>
> A few reasons I think it makes sense in this instance:
>
> * Not every set of trademark tests will
On 08/03/18 12:57, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Why would the repos be owned by anyone other than the original project
team?
A few reasons I think it makes sense in this instance:
* Not every set of trademark tests will necessarily belong to a single
project. Tempest itself is an example of this -
>
> Why would the repos be owned by anyone other than the original project
> team?
>
For normal tempest tests, which owned and maintained by original projects.
I think there were discussions in that PTG QA session about interop tests
should be maintained by QA team.
>
In the new resolution, we
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-03-08 12:45:11 -0500:
> On 07/03/18 08:44, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
> > I mean i am all ok with separate plugin which is more easy for QA team
> > but ownership to QA is kind of going to same direction(QA team
> > maintaining interop ads-on tests) in more
On 07/03/18 08:44, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
I mean i am all ok with separate plugin which is more easy for QA team
but ownership to QA is kind of going to same direction(QA team
maintaining interop ads-on tests) in more difficult way.
After reading this and the logs from the QA meeting,[1] I
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:15 PM, Andrea Frittoli
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:42 PM Ghanshyam Mann
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> QA had discussion in Dublin PTG about interop adds-on tests location.
>> First of all thanks all
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:42 PM Ghanshyam Mann
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> QA had discussion in Dublin PTG about interop adds-on tests location.
> First of all thanks all (specially markvoelker, dhellmann, mugsie) for
> joining the sessions. and I am glad we conclude the
10 matches
Mail list logo