On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote:
I'll propose something via a spec to ceilometer for sensor naming which will
include the ability to support the new health sensor information.
Excellent.
Do you happen to know what some of the use cases are for the current
reporting of sensor informa
Chris,
Use case point well taken :-)
I'll propose something via a spec to ceilometer for sensor naming which
will
include the ability to support the new health sensor information.
From a use case perspective, I want to provide the health of every
platform
so an administrator can be notified
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote:
On 10/20/2014 6:53 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote:
See answers inline. I don't have any concrete answers as to how to deal
with some of questions you brought up, but I do have some more detail
that may be useful to furthe
On 10/20/2014 6:53 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote:
See answers inline. I don't have any concrete answers as to how to deal
with some of questions you brought up, but I do have some more detail
that may be useful to further the discussion.
That seems like progr
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote:
See answers inline. I don't have any concrete answers as to how to deal
with some of questions you brought up, but I do have some more detail
that may be useful to further the discussion.
That seems like progress to me.
Personally, I would like to se
Chris,
See answers inline. I don't have any concrete answers as to how to deal
with some of questions you brought up, but I do have some more detail
that may be useful to further the discussion.
On 10/17/2014 11:03 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote:
What I would lik
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote:
What I would like to propose is dropping the ipmi string from the name
altogether and appending the Sensor ID to the name instead of to the
Resource ID. So, transforming the above to the new naming would result in
the following:
| Name
Hi Jim,
On 10/16/2014 07:23 PM, Jim Mankovich wrote:
All,
I would like to get some feedback on a proposal to change to the
current sensor naming implemented in ironic and ceilometer.
I would like to provide vendor specific sensors within the current
structure for IPMI sensors in ironic and ce
On Thu, Oct 16 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote:
> This structure would provide the ability for a consumer to do a ceilometer
> resource list using the Ironic Node ID as the Resource ID to get all the
> sensors
> in a given platform. The consumer would then then iterate over each of the
> sensors to g
All,
I would like to get some feedback on a proposal to change to the
current sensor naming implemented in ironic and ceilometer.
I would like to provide vendor specific sensors within the current
structure for IPMI sensors in ironic and ceilometer, but I have found
that the current implem
10 matches
Mail list logo
