On 27 January 2014 18:08, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Thanks, guess this is entering the realm of scheduling & group scheduling and
> how "just the right" level of information is needed to do efficient group
> scheduling in nova/ironic vs the new/upcoming gantt service.
>
> To me splitting it into N
Thanks, guess this is entering the realm of scheduling & group scheduling and
how "just the right" level of information is needed to do efficient group
scheduling in nova/ironic vs the new/upcoming gantt service.
To me splitting it into N single requests isn't group scheduling but is just
more
On 27 January 2014 08:04, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Doesn't nova already have logic for creating N virtual machines (similar to a
> group) in the same request? I thought it did (maybe it doesn't anymore in the
> v3 API), creating N bare metal machines seems like it would comply to that
> api?
It
Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2014-01-26 10:27:36 -0800:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >
> > Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-01-25 02:47:42 -0800:
> > > On 25 January 2014 19:42, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > > > Excerpts from Robert Collins's
Doesn't nova already have logic for creating N virtual machines (similar to a
group) in the same request? I thought it did (maybe it doesn't anymore in the
v3 API), creating N bare metal machines seems like it would comply to that api?
Sent from my really tiny device...
> On Jan 22, 2014, at 4:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-01-25 02:47:42 -0800:
> > On 25 January 2014 19:42, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > > Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-01-24 18:48:41 -0800:
> >
> > >> > However, in looking at how Ironic w
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-01-25 02:47:42 -0800:
> On 25 January 2014 19:42, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-01-24 18:48:41 -0800:
>
> >> > However, in looking at how Ironic works and interacts with Nova, it
> >> > doesn't seem like there
On 25 January 2014 19:42, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-01-24 18:48:41 -0800:
>> > However, in looking at how Ironic works and interacts with Nova, it
>> > doesn't seem like there is any distinction of data per-compute-node
>> > inside Ironic. So for this to
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-01-24 18:48:41 -0800:
> On 25 Jan 2014 15:11, "Clint Byrum" wrote:
> >
> > Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2014-01-22 16:44:01
> -0800:
> >
> > What Tuskar wants to do is layer workloads on top of logical and physical
> > groupings.
On 23 Jan 2014 13:45, "Devananda van der Veen"
wrote:
>
> So, a conversation came again up today around whether or not Ironic will,
in the future, support operations on groups of nodes. Some folks have
expressed a desire for Ironic to expose operations on groups of nodes;
others want Ironic to hos
On 25 Jan 2014 15:11, "Clint Byrum" wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2014-01-22 16:44:01
-0800:
>
> What Tuskar wants to do is layer workloads on top of logical and physical
> groupings. So it would pass to Nova "Boot 4 machines with (flavor)
> and distinct(failure_doma
Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2014-01-22 16:44:01 -0800:
>
> 1: physical vs. logical grouping
> - Some hardware is logically, but not strictly physically, grouped. Eg, 1U
> servers in the same rack. There is some grouping, such as failure domain,
> but operations on discrete no
> So, a conversation came again up today around whether or not Ironic will,
> in the future, support operations on groups of nodes. Some folks have
> expressed a desire for Ironic to expose operations on groups of nodes;
> others want Ironic to host the hardware-grouping data so that eg. Heat and
>
So, a conversation came again up today around whether or not Ironic will,
in the future, support operations on groups of nodes. Some folks have
expressed a desire for Ironic to expose operations on groups of nodes;
others want Ironic to host the hardware-grouping data so that eg. Heat and
Tuskar ca
14 matches
Mail list logo
