On 10 November 2015 at 11:31, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 11/10/2015 05:21 PM, Brad P. Crochet wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Dmitry Tantsur
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> I'd like to seek consensus (or at least some opinions) on patch
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Brad P. Crochet wrote:
> In this case, the noun is actually 'baremetal provision state'. The
> 'action' is the states themselves. It doesn't fit exactly, but seems
> to at least be somewhat natural.
resource == provision state (add baremetal if
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Brad P. Crochet wrote:
> There was some discussion on one of the patches about changing to
> 'baremetal node'. I was a little concerned by that since the original
> 'baremetal' commands have landed, but I think since they landed
> post-Liberty,
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'd like to seek consensus (or at least some opinions) on patch
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/206119/
> It proposed the following command:
>
I think it's time to actually just write up a spec on this.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'd like to seek consensus (or at least some opinions) on patch
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/206119/
> It proposed the following command:
>
> openstack baremetal provision state --provide UUID
>
>
On 11/10/2015 05:21 PM, Brad P. Crochet wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
Hi all!
I'd like to seek consensus (or at least some opinions) on patch
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/206119/
It proposed the following command:
I think it's time
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Brad P. Crochet wrote:
>>
>> In this case, the noun is actually 'baremetal provision state'. The
>> 'action' is the states themselves. It doesn't fit exactly, but seems
>>
Hi,
> Let's have a quick poll, which would you prefer and why:
>
> 1. openstack baremetal provision state --provide UUID
> 2. openstack baremetal provision --provide UUID
> 3. openstack baremetal provide UUID
> 4. openstack baremetal set provision state --provide UUID
> 5. openstack baremetal set
Hi all!
I'd like to seek consensus (or at least some opinions) on patch
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/206119/
It proposed the following command:
openstack baremetal provision state --provide UUID
(where --provide can also be --active, --deleted, --inspect, etc).
I have several issues