[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] HA functionality discussion

2014-04-17 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Heyas, y'all! So, given both the prioritization and usage info on HA functionality for Neutron LBaaS here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ar1FuMFYRhgadDVXZ25NM2NfbGtLTkR0TDFNUWJQUWc&usp=sharing It's clear that: A. HA seems to be a top priority for most operators B. Almost all load

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] HA functionality discussion

2014-04-17 Thread Susanne Balle
I agree that the HA should be hidden to the user/tenant. IMHO a tenant should just use a load-balancer as a “managed” black box where the service is resilient in itself. Our current Libra/LBaaS implementation in the HP public cloud uses a pool of standby LB to replace failing tenant’s LB. Our LB

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] HA functionality discussion

2014-04-17 Thread Carlos Garza
On Apr 17, 2014, at 5:49 PM, Stephen Balukoff mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net>> wrote: Heyas, y'all! So, given both the prioritization and usage info on HA functionality for Neutron LBaaS here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ar1FuMFYRhgadDVXZ25NM2NfbGtLTkR0TDFNUWJQUWc&usp=sharing