:* Adam Harwell [mailto:adam.harw...@rackspace.com]
*Sent:* Saturday, May 03, 2014 10:17 AM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Use-Cases with VPNs
Distinction
Sounds about right to me. I guess I agree with your
Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Use-Cases with VPNs
Distinction
Hi Sam,
So, If I understand you correctly, you don't think that specifying routing
rules (eg. static routing configuration) should be beyond the scope of
LBaaS?
I
@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Friday, May 2, 2014 7:53 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Use-Cases with VPNs Distinction
Hi
I think that associating a VIP subnet and list of member subnets is a good
choice.
This is declaratively saying to where is the configuration expecting layer 2
proximity.
The minimal would be the VIP subnet which in essence means the VIP and members
are expected on the same subnet.
Any member
Agree with Sam here,
Moreover, i think it makes sense to leave subnet an attribute of the pool.
Which would mean that members reside in that subnet or are available
(routable) from this subnet, and LB should have a port on this subnet.
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Samuel
Hi guys,
Yep, so what I'm hearing is that we should be able to assume that either
all members in a single pool are adjacent (ie. layer-2 connected), or are
routable from that subnet.
Adam-- I could see it going either way with regard to how to communicate
with members: If the particular device
Hello,
After going back through the use-cases to double check some of my
understanding, I realized I didn't quite understand the ones I had
already answered. I'll use a specific use-case as an example of my
misunderstanding here, and hopefully the clarification can be easily
adapted to the rest
Hi Trevor,
I was the one who wrote that use case based on discussion that came out of
the question I wrote the list last week about SSL re-encryption: Someone
had stated that sometimes pool members are local, and sometimes they are
hosts across the internet, accessible either through the usual
Date: Thursday, May 1, 2014 7:48 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Use-Cases with VPNs Distinction
Hi Trevor,
I was the one who wrote that use
On May 1, 2014, at 7:48 PM, Stephen Balukoff
sbaluk...@bluebox.netmailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Hi Trevor,
I was the one who wrote that use case based on discussion that came out of the
question I wrote the list last week about SSL re-encryption: Someone had
stated that sometimes
10 matches
Mail list logo
