: PEM-formatted string
> Regards,
> Evg
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 2:05 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Cc: Abhishek Gautam
> Subje
.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 2:05 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Abhishek Gautam
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate as
first-class citizen - SSL Termination (Revised)
Thanks for the detailed
ge questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate
> as first-class citizen - SSL Termination (Revised)
>
> Hi All.
> The wiki page for LBaaS SSL support was updated.
> Please see and comment
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/SSL#V
(not for usage questions)
Cc: Evgeny Fedoruk; Samuel Bercovici
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate as
first-class citizen - SSL Termination (Revised)
Correct.
Evgeny will update the WIKI accordingly.
We will add a flag in the SSL Certificate to allow
ssage-
From: Nachi Ueno [mailto:na...@ntti3.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 8:21 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate as
first-class citizen - SSL Termination (Revised)
Hi folks
O
el Bercovici wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Stephen,
>>>
>>> To make sure I understand, which model is fine "Basic/Simple" or "New".
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Sam.
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Messag
Message-
>> From: Stephen Gran [mailto:stephen.g...@theguardian.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 8:22 AM
>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for
>> certificate as first-class citizen - SS
ack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate as
first-class citizen - SSL Termination (Revised)
Hi,
I would be happy with this model. Yes, longer term it might be nice to have an
independent certificate store so that when you need to be able to valida
ject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate as
first-class citizen - SSL Termination (Revised)
Hi,
I would be happy with this model. Yes, longer term it might be nice to have an
independent certificate store so that when you need to be able to validate ssl
you can
Hi,
I would be happy with this model. Yes, longer term it might be nice to
have an independent certificate store so that when you need to be able
to validate ssl you can, but this is a good intermediate step.
Cheers,
On 02/12/13 09:16, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote:
LBaaS enthusiasts: Your vo
2013 11:16 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate as
first-class citizen - SSL Termination (Revised)
LBaaS enthusiasts: Your vote on the revised model for SSL Termination?
Here is a comparison be
Hi Vijay
I was thinking about we should store this kind of information on the keystone.
However, I changed my mind after checking keystone API.
The keystone api is very generic, so we can't provider application
specific helper method and validations on that.
The form of certificate is different b
LBaaS enthusiasts: Your vote on the revised model for SSL Termination?
Here is a comparison between the original and revised model for SSL Termination:
***
Original Basic Model that was proposed in summit
***
* Certificate parameters introduced as part of VIP resource.
*
13 matches
Mail list logo
