German [mailto:german.eichber...@hpe.com]
>>Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 8:30 PM
>>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
>>
>>Hi Sam,
>>
>>So if you have some
)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
Hi Kevin,
Floating IP will work in V2 as well :-)
Thanks,
German
On 3/7/16, 2:47 PM, "Fox, Kevin M" <kevin@pnnl.gov> wrote:
>You can attach a floating ip onto a vip. Thats what we've
velopment Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
>
>Hi Sam,
>
>So if you have some 3rd party hardware you only need to change the
>database (your steps 1-5) since the 3rd party hardware will just keep
>
M
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
>
>Ok. Thanks for the info.
>
>Kevin
>
>From: Brandon Logan [brandon.lo...@rackspace.com]
>
velopment Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
>
>Ok. Thanks for the info.
>
>Kevin
>
>From: Brandon Logan [brandon.lo...@rackspace.com]
>Sent: Thursday
v2.
>
>Thanks,
>Kevin
>
>From: Samuel Bercovici [samu...@radware.com]
>Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 11:00 AM
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1
From: Eichberger, German [german.eichber...@hpe.com]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 2:27 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
Ok, for what it’s worth we have contributed our migration script
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
As far as I recall, you can specify the VIP in creating the LB so you will end
up with same IPs.
-Original Message-
From: Eichberger, German [mailto:german.eichber
not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
>
>Hi Sam,
>
>So if you have some 3rd party hardware you only need to change the database
>(your steps 1-5) since the 3rd party hardware will just keep load balancing…
>
>Now for
: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
Hi Sam,
So if you have some 3rd party hardware you only need to change the database
(your steps 1-5) since the 3rd party hardware will just keep load balancing…
Now for Kevin’s case with the namespace driver:
You would need
modification for mapping
>between v1 and v2 models)
>
>What do you think?
>
>-Sam.
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Fox, Kevin M [mailto:kevin@pnnl.gov]
>Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 2:06 AM
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage ques
vin@pnnl.gov]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 2:06 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
Ok. Thanks for the info.
Kevin
From: Brandon Logan [brandon
Ok. Thanks for the info.
Kevin
From: Brandon Logan [brandon.lo...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:42 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
Just for clarity
PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
>
> Kevin,
>
> If we are offering a migration tool it would be namespace -> namespace (or
> maybe Octavia since [1]) — giv
: Eichberger, German [german.eichber...@hpe.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 12:47 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
Kevin,
If we are offering a migration tool it would be namespace
at 5:17 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
no removal without an upgrade path. I've g
(not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
I am also on-board with removing LBaaS v1 as early as possible in the Newton
cycle.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Samuel Bercovici
<samu...@radware.com<mailto:samu...@radware.com>>
penstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are
> weready?
>
>
>
> And as for the Heat support, the resources have made Mitaka, with
> additional functional tests on the way soon.
>
>
>
> blueprint: https:/
02, 2016 5:54 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
And as for the Heat support, the resources have made Mitaka, with additional
functional tests on the way soon.
blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat
And as for the Heat support, the resources have made Mitaka, with additional functional tests on the way soon.
blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/lbaasv2-suport
gerrit topic: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/lbaasv2-suport
BRYAN M. JONES
Software Engineer - OpenStack
20 matches
Mail list logo
