OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Magnum] Container + OpenStack
> Integration
>
> Hi,
>
> Just brainstorming here, but IMHO it would be good to keep it extensible
> and not to lock in VLAN as the sole
: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Magnum] Container + OpenStack Integration
Hi,
Just brainstorming here, but IMHO it would be good to keep it extensible and
not to lock in VLAN as the sole container "VIF" mechanism. For instance, there
is the ipvlan [1] technology that was purpose-built to be more a
Hi,
Just brainstorming here, but IMHO it would be good to keep it extensible
and not to lock in VLAN as the sole container "VIF" mechanism. For
instance, there is the ipvlan [1] technology that was purpose-built to be
more appropriate for container systems. This tech actually comes from some
of th
Hi,
I wasn't able to make it to the session but from the etherpad I saw
that the VLAN-aware VMs mentioned there. Would that be enough to cover
this particular use-case?
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Adrian Otto wrote:
> Magnum and Neutron Teams,
>
> If you are in Vancouver today and can help
Magnum and Neutron Teams,
If you are in Vancouver today and can help design or implement native
networking support to obviate the need for overlay networks when using
containers, please join this design session:
http://sched.co/3CjK (3:30 PM, Room 303)
This will be based on feedback gathered a
