On 19 August 2014 23:15, Alan Kavanagh wrote:
> +1, I am hoping this is just a short term holding point and this will
> eventually be merged into main branch as this is a feature a lot of
> companies, us included would definitely benefit from having supported and
> many thanks to Sean for stickin
this.
>> /Alan
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Collins, Sean [mailto:sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com]
>> Sent: August-19-14 8:33 PM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Req
ation binding,
without reinvent these overlapped concept.
From: Salvatore Orlando [sorla...@nicira.com<mailto:sorla...@nicira.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 6:12 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS]
einvent these overlapped concept.
>
> --
> *From:* Salvatore Orlando [sorla...@nicira.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 20, 2014 6:12 AM
>
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][
e overlapped concept.
From: Salvatore Orlando [sorla...@nicira.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 6:12 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Request to be considered for
neutron-incubator
In the
ean for sticking with this and continue to push this.
> /Alan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Collins, Sean [mailto:sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com]
> Sent: August-19-14 8:33 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutr
-Original Message-
From: Collins, Sean [mailto:sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com]
Sent: August-19-14 8:33 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Request to be considered for
neutron-incubator
Hi,
The QoS API extension has lived
Actually, whether the incubator is involved for not, this might be a
great candidate for implementation using an ML2 extension driver. See
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89211/ for the code under review for
Juno, and also
https://docs.google.com/a/noironetworks.com/document/d/14T-defRnFl6M2xR
+1.
This work in particular brings up a question about the incubator. One of
the rules was that the neutron core code can't import code from the
incubated projects. The QoS requires a mixin to annotate the port and
network objects with QoS settings. How exactly would we actually use the
QoS code f
Hi,
The QoS API extension has lived in Gerrit/been in review for about a
year. It's gone through revisions, summit design sessions, and for a
little while, a subteam.
I would like to request incubation in the upcoming incubator, so that
the code will have a more permanent "home" where we can coll
10 matches
Mail list logo
