quot;Randy Tuttle" mailto:randy.m.tut...@gmail.com>>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Cc: rantu...@cisco.com<mailto:rantu...@cisco.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 6:43:50 PM
Subject: Re:
ure have more then one (global) IPv6 on an interface.
> Shouldn't we support this?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Nir
>
> --
> *From: *"Randy Tuttle"
> *To: *"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Cc: rantu...@cisco.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 6:43:50 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Allow multiple subnets on gateway port
for router
Hi Nir
Good question. There's absolutely no reason not to allow more than 2 subnets,
or even 2 of the same IP versions on the
Hi Nir
Good question. There's absolutely no reason not to allow more than 2
subnets, or even 2 of the same IP versions on the gateway port. In fact, in
our POC we allowed this (or, more specifically, we did not disallow it).
However, for the gateway port to the provider's next-hop router, we did n
Hi,
With regards to
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/allow-multiple-subnets-on-gateway-port,
can you please clarify this statement: "We will disallow more that two
subnets, and exclude allowing 2 IPv4 or 2 IPv6 subnets".
The use case for dual-stack with one IPv4 and one IPv6 add
