tack Development Mailing List;
sorla...@nicira.com<mailto:sorla...@nicira.com>; Avishay Balderman;
gary.kot...@gmail.com<mailto:gary.kot...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Chalenges with highly available service
VMs - port adn security group options.
I agree too. I'
n [mailto:aro...@nicira.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:52 PM
> *To:* Samuel Bercovici
> *Cc:* OpenStack Development Mailing List; sorla...@nicira.com; Avishay
> Balderman; gary.kot...@gmail.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Chalenges with highly available
y, July 23, 2013 10:52 PM
To: Samuel Bercovici
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List; sorla...@nicira.com; Avishay Balderman;
gary.kot...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Chalenges with highly available service
VMs - port adn security group options.
I agree too. I've p
t; *Sent:* Sunday, July 21, 2013 9:56 PM
>
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Chalenges with highly available
> service VMs - port adn security group options.
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On 19 July
,
-Sam.
From: Salvatore Orlando [mailto:sorla...@nicira.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2013 9:56 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Chalenges with highly available service
VMs - port adn security group options.
On 19 July 2013 13:14, Aaron
On 19 July 2013 13:14, Aaron Rosen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Samuel Bercovici wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I have completely missed this discussion as it does not have
>> quantum/Neutron in the subject (modify it now)
>>
>> I think that the security group is th
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Samuel Bercovici wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ** **
>
> I have completely missed this discussion as it does not have
> quantum/Neutron in the subject (modify it now)
>
> I think that the security group is the right place to control this.
>
> I think that this migh
Adding the original people conversing on this subject to this mail.
Regards,
-Sam.
On Jul 19, 2013, at 11:57 AM, "Samuel Bercovici"
mailto:samu...@radware.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I have completely missed this discussion as it does not have quantum/Neutron in
the subject (modify it now)
Hi,
I have completely missed this discussion as it does not have quantum/Neutron in
the subject (modify it now)
I think that the security group is the right place to control this.
I think that this might be only allowed to admins.
Let me explain what we need which is more than just disable spoof
