[openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] Rocky goals for Networking L2GW

Hi L2GWers, Eventhough this is a project with few active contributors, these are our goals for Rocky release: - OpenStack client migration - Out-of-sync DB common effort (together with networking-odl, networking-ovn, etc.) - Broad CI jobs scenarios (adding a HWVTEP emultator) -

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] stable/queens tripleo issues

Thanks!! When its ready we can add it again. Thank you! From: Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 9:14 AM To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [opens

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] stable/queens tripleo issues

Hey Gary :-) Yeah our CI isn't ready yet for stable/queens, sorry for that. I propose to disable TripleO jobs in stable/queens for l2gw project: https://review.openstack.org/546059 Hopefully that helps! Cheers, On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, >

[openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] stable/queens tripleo issues

Hi, At the moment the stable/queens branch is broken due to the tripleo CI test failing [i]. Does anyone have any hints here on what we should look at? I am not sure if this is with ansible/centos… Thanks Gary [i]

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] Preventing DB out-of-sync

Just for awareness on this subject. Peng has proposed an initial patch to tackle this issue: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/529009/6 On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Ricardo Noriega De Soto < rnori...@redhat.com> wrote: > Peng, I think you are right. We should have a common behavior among

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] Preventing DB out-of-sync

Peng, I think you are right. We should have a common behavior among the drivers, and move the implementation to the proper methods like post-commits, do the validation on the pre-commits, etc, etc. Second phase to tackle the out-of-sync could be the "revision number" approach from networking-ovn.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] Preventing DB out-of-sync

Hi Michael, Yes, it's a similar issue but different aspect. Actually, the case for l2gw is worse, considering we have to deal with 2 existing back-end driver which have different understanding for the interfaces. But I think the proposed approach for networking-ovn is inspiring and helpful for

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] Preventing DB out-of-sync

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:46 AM, Peng Liu wrote: > Hi, > > During working on this patch[0], I encounter some DB out-of-sync problem. I > think maybe the design can be improved. Here is my thought, all comments are > welcome. see also https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490834/

[openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] Preventing DB out-of-sync

Hi, During working on this patch[0], I encounter some DB out-of-sync problem. I think maybe the design can be improved. Here is my thought, all comments are welcome. In plugin code, I found all the resource operations follow the pattern in [1]. It is a very misleading design compare to [2].

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [l2gw] DSVM gates for networking-l2gw

It may be a non-negligible effort to make ovs containerized in the namespace in the first place (that's one of the things we still miss in fullstack in neutron repo). I know that Terry Wilson had some code for that, but I can't find it right now. Ihar On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Ricardo

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [l2gw] DSVM gates for networking-l2gw

The idea for the future is to enable a new job with the l2gw agent enabled. In order to do that, I thought about creating a network namespace running an OVS instance with the hwvtep schema so the l2gw agent can connect to it. This is just a first rough idea and I haven't tested anything. Do you

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [l2gw] DSVM gates for networking-l2gw

Plan sounds fine. Those interested in ovs backend may build on top, but at least laying basic api coverage with a fake/dummy driver is a must for a service plugin project that is serious about integration with Neutron. Ihar On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Ricardo Noriega De Soto

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [l2gw] DSVM gates for networking-l2gw

Hello, The dummy driver allows you to make writes/reads from the database and that's something we should be continuously testing. I think you cannot achieve that mocking the API calls. Cheers On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Daniel Mellado wrote: > Hi Ricardo, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [l2gw] DSVM gates for networking-l2gw

Hi Ricardo, That sounds like a totally valid approach to me, but I was wondering if there'd be a way to mock that API call. If just using the dummy driver would achieve that then I'd be more than happy to see that modification. Cheers! Daniel El 15/06/17 a las 06:38, Ricardo Noriega De Soto

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [l2gw] DSVM gates for networking-l2gw

Hello L2GWers Currently networking-l2gw CI only covers unit tests. However, there is an experimental check that starts a devstack VM to be able to run more complex tests. That experimental check is not working, and we are trying to fix it, however we encountered some difficulties that we wanted

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] OVS code currently broken

Hi Kevin, There was already a bug filed about the Tempest plugin: https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-l2gw/+bug/1692529 Thanks On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: > Can you file a bug against Neutron and reference it here? > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:28

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] OVS code currently broken

Can you file a bug against Neutron and reference it here? On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Ricardo Noriega De Soto wrote: > There is actually a bunch of patches waiting to be reviewed and approved. > > Please, we'd need core reviewers to jump in. > > I'd like to thank Gary

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] OVS code currently broken

There is actually a bunch of patches waiting to be reviewed and approved. Please, we'd need core reviewers to jump in. I'd like to thank Gary for all his support and reviews. Thanks Gary! On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > > Please note that the

[openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] OVS code currently broken

Hi, Please note that the L2 GW code is currently broken due to the commit e6333593ae6005c4b0d73d9dfda5eb47f40dd8da If someone has the cycles can they please take a look. Thanks gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

[openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] stable/newton

Hi, Are there any plans to cut a stable/newton branch here? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

[openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw]Idea of redundant L2GW

Hi, I want to connect VXLAN segments to VLAN segments using a L2GW, and I want the L2GW to be redundant which is achieved by two or more baremetals. Is there some ideas for that? Or should I use STP/RSTP on OpenvSwitches? Regard, Eigo

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] New core member

Folks, I am pleased to announce the addition of Ofer Ben-Yakov as new core team member of L2 Gateway team. Ofer has been working hard and contributing to solidify L2GW framework as well adding new features to the L2GW. The team welcomes Ofer on board and look forward to work with him. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW][Tricircle]Border Gateway support

- From: Sean M. Collins [mailto:s...@coreitpro.com] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 11:06 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW][Tricircle]Border Gateway support joehuang wrote: > And one session[3] in Austin summit cal

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW][Tricircle]Border Gateway support

joehuang wrote: > And one session[3] in Austin summit called for action in the community to > prioritize and accelerate Tricircle development. > > [1]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/270786/ > [2]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304540/ >

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW][Tricircle]Border Gateway support

Thanks a lot. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) From: Sukhdev Kapur [mailto:sukhdevka...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 4:06 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: armando.migliac...@hp.com Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2 Gateway now available

Hi Martinx, L2GW is designed to bridge neutron networks with non-neutron networks to form a L2 broadcast domain - not two neutron networks. regards.. -Sukhdev On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > > > On 11 May 2016 at 16:05, Sukhdev Kapur

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2 Gateway now available

On 11 May 2016 at 16:05, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: > > Folks, > > I am happy to announce that Mitaka release for L2 Gateway is released and > now available at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/networking-l2gw. > > You can install it by using "pip install networking-l2gw" > > This

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2 Gateway now available

On 16 May 2016 at 05:15, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > > On 11 May 2016, at 22:05, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: > > > > > > Folks, > > > > I am happy to announce that Mitaka release for L2 Gateway is released > and now available at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2 Gateway now available

> On 11 May 2016, at 22:05, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: > > > Folks, > > I am happy to announce that Mitaka release for L2 Gateway is released and now > available at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/networking-l2gw. > > You can install it by using "pip install networking-l2gw"

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2 Gateway now available

Can you move this documentation to the networking guide where operators/users can locate it more easily? On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: > Hi Matt, > > If you look through the documentation, there are steps described to > install L2GW outside of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2 Gateway now available

Hi Matt, If you look through the documentation, there are steps described to install L2GW outside of devstack. -Sukhdev On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Matt Kassawara wrote: > Do you have any examples of how to implement L2GW outside of DevStack? > Operators do not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2 Gateway now available

Do you have any examples of how to implement L2GW outside of DevStack? Operators do not deploy on DevStack. On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: > Hi Matt, > > > Here is the wiki - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/L2-GW > > This should provide you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2 Gateway now available

Hi Matt, Here is the wiki - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/L2-GW This should provide you all the information that you need. -Sukhdev On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Matt Kassawara wrote: > Can you point me to the documentation? > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2 Gateway now available

Can you point me to the documentation? On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: > > Folks, > > I am happy to announce that Mitaka release for L2 Gateway is released and > now available at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/networking-l2gw. > > You can install it

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2 Gateway now available

Folks, I am happy to announce that Mitaka release for L2 Gateway is released and now available at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/networking-l2gw. You can install it by using "pip install networking-l2gw" This release has several enhancements and fixes for issues discovered in liberty release.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L2gw

Yes, I am on it. I was waiting for a Green Light from few folks, which I got this morning. So, I will be working on releasing it sometime tomorrow. Hope that is OK with everybody. -Sukhdev On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 9 May 2016 at 18:03, Gary

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L2gw

On 9 May 2016 at 18:03, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Are there plans to cut a a stable/mitaka version for the l2gw? > https://github.com/openstack/networking-l2gw > Thanks > Gary > I know Sukhdev was working on it. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L2gw

Good catch! Cheers, S On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Are there plans to cut a a stable/mitaka version for the l2gw? > https://github.com/openstack/networking-l2gw > Thanks > Gary > >

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] L2gw

Hi, Are there plans to cut a a stable/mitaka version for the l2gw? https://github.com/openstack/networking-l2gw Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: