Hello everyone,
There is regarding the following bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1373359
May I know what is the significance of having the '*udp_port'* field in the
*'ml2_vxlan_endpoints*' table in Neutron DB, Do we have any plans in
future that we could use this field for synchroni
Hi romil,
I think the main purpose of this DB field is to maintain the compatibility
in dataplane between OVS and LinuxBridge which, by default, don't use the
same UDP port for VXLAN.
It might be useful for a cloud admin which wants to run some nodes with LB
and some others with OVS.
I feel like
Mathieu,
now I'm getting curious, is it possible to combine Linuxbridge and OVS
VXLAN Nodes in the same cloud?
I thought this does not work as Linuxbridge-vxlan uses multicast for
instances broad- and multicasts (e.g. an arp request), while ovs-vxlan
only does unicast? At least one can specify a
On 23 March 2015 at 14:49, Mathieu Rohon wrote:
> Hi romil,
>
> I think the main purpose of this DB field is to maintain the compatibility
> in dataplane between OVS and LinuxBridge which, by default, don't use the
> same UDP port for VXLAN.
>
It might be useful for a cloud admin which wants to r
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Salvatore Orlando
wrote:
>
>
> On 23 March 2015 at 14:49, Mathieu Rohon wrote:
>
>> Hi romil,
>>
>> I think the main purpose of this DB field is to maintain the
>> compatibility in dataplane between OVS and LinuxBridge which, by default,
>> don't use the same UD
Hi Andreas,
Linuxbridge is also able to use Unicast, but currently, it is only
available when l2pop is activated.
AFAIR, I saw the mix of LB agents and ovs agent working, with vxlan, l2pop
and and ARP responders turned on everywhere. You also have to tune your
vxlan module, or ovs, to make sure th
Thank's Mathieu,
I would probably first try out running KVM in mixed environment using OVS
and LB as L2 agent with VXLAN underlay. And, try to implement as you
suggested on the patchset within kilo or liberty release cycle.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Mathieu Rohon
wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
>
