24, 2014 9:20 AM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel P.
>> Berrange
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Spec freeze exception] Controlled
>> shutdown of GuestOS
>>
>> According to: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/n
ack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel P.
> Berrange
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Spec freeze exception] Controlled
> shutdown of GuestOS
>
> According to: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-juno-spec-priorities
> alaski has also singed u
From: Day, Phil [philip@hp.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 9:20 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel P.
Berrange
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Spec freeze exception] Controlled shutdown
of GuestOS
Mailing List (not for usage
>> questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Spec freeze exception] Controlled
>> shutdown of GuestOS
>>
>> Another core sponsor would be nice on this one. Any takers?
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at
aniel P. Berrange; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Spec freeze exception] Controlled
> shutdown of GuestOS
>
> Another core sponsor would be nice on this one. Any takers?
>
> Michael
>
> On Thu, Jul 24,
Another core sponsor would be nice on this one. Any takers?
Michael
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 06:08:52PM +, Day, Phil wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I'd like to propose the following as an exception to the spec freeze, on the
>> basis th
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 06:08:52PM +, Day, Phil wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'd like to propose the following as an exception to the spec freeze, on the
> basis that it addresses a potential data corruption issues in the Guest.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89650
>
> We were pretty close
Hi Folks,
I'd like to propose the following as an exception to the spec freeze, on the
basis that it addresses a potential data corruption issues in the Guest.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89650
We were pretty close to getting acceptance on this before, apart from a debate
over whether one
