I'm good with this one too, so that makes three if Joe is ok with this.
@Josh -- can you please take a look at the TH failures?
Thanks,
Michael
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 9/3/2014 5:08 PM, Andrey Kurilin wrote:
Hi All!
I'd like to
Hey,
Yep, I became aware of these this afternoon. The negative votes are due
to a bad nodepool image. I've rebuilt them and am working on clearing
the backlog. Sorry for the issues.
Cheers,
Josh
Rackspace Australia
On 9/4/14 4:30 PM, Michael Still wrote:
I'm good with this one too, so
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
I'm good with this one too, so that makes three if Joe is ok with this.
I am ok with this, I hope the move to oslo.db will fix a few bugs for us
and the nova patch to review isn't too bad.
@Josh -- can you please take
Approved.
Michael
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
I'm good with this one too, so that makes three if Joe is ok with this.
I am ok with this, I hope the move to oslo.db will
Hi All!
I'd like to ask for a feature freeze exception for porting nova to use
oslo.db.
This change not only removes 3k LOC, but fixes 4 bugs(see commit message
for more details) and provides relevant, stable common db code.
Main maintainers of oslo.db(Roman Podoliaka and Victor Sergeyev) are
On 9/3/2014 5:08 PM, Andrey Kurilin wrote:
Hi All!
I'd like to ask for a feature freeze exception for porting nova to use
oslo.db.
This change not only removes 3k LOC, but fixes 4 bugs(see commit message
for more details) and provides relevant, stable common db code.
Main maintainers of
