On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Jarret Raim wrote:
>
>
> On 9/9/13 9:25 AM, "Russell Bryant" wrote:
>
> >On 09/09/2013 04:57 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> >> Russell Bryant wrote:
> >>> I would be good with the exception for this, assuming that:
> >>>
> >>> 1) Those from nova-core that have reviewe
On 9/9/13 9:25 AM, "Russell Bryant" wrote:
>On 09/09/2013 04:57 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> Russell Bryant wrote:
>>> I would be good with the exception for this, assuming that:
>>>
>>> 1) Those from nova-core that have reviewed the code are still happy
>>>with
>>> it and would do a final revi
On 09/09/2013 04:57 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Russell Bryant wrote:
>> I would be good with the exception for this, assuming that:
>>
>> 1) Those from nova-core that have reviewed the code are still happy with
>> it and would do a final review to get it merged.
>>
>> 2) There is general consensus
Russell Bryant wrote:
> I would be good with the exception for this, assuming that:
>
> 1) Those from nova-core that have reviewed the code are still happy with
> it and would do a final review to get it merged.
>
> 2) There is general consensus that the simple config based key manager
> (single
Bruce - well-crafted message. Good work, looks like it is eliciting desired
result.
From: Benjamin, Bruce P. [mailto:bruce.benja...@jhuapl.edu]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 1:14 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: Encrypt Cinder volumes
We
) feature by default off.
Regards
malini
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 2:47 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: Encrypt Cinder volumes
On 09/06/2013 04:14 PM
> 2) There is general consensus that the simple config based key manager
> (single key) does provide some amount of useful security. I believe it
> does, just want to make sure we're in agreement on it. Obviously we
> want to improve this in the future.
>
I believe that it does add value. For e
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Bryan D. Payne wrote:
>
> 2) There is general consensus that the simple config based key manager
>> (single key) does provide some amount of useful security. I believe it
>> does, just want to make sure we're in agreement on it. Obviously we
>> want to improve th
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 09/06/2013 04:14 PM, Benjamin, Bruce P. wrote:
> > We request that volume encryption [1] be granted an exception to the
> > feature freeze for Havana-3. Volume encryption [2] provides a usable
> > layer of protection to user data as it i
On 09/06/2013 04:14 PM, Benjamin, Bruce P. wrote:
> We request that volume encryption [1] be granted an exception to the
> feature freeze for Havana-3. Volume encryption [2] provides a usable
> layer of protection to user data as it is transmitted through a network
> and when it is stored on disk.
We request that volume encryption [1] be granted an exception to the feature
freeze for Havana-3. Volume encryption [2] provides a usable layer of
protection to user data as it is transmitted through a network and when it is
stored on disk. The main patch [2] has been under review since the end
11 matches
Mail list logo
