Teng <teng...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Cc: Fei K Chen/China/IBM@IBMCN, Yong Hua Lin/China/IBM@IBMCN
Date: 2016/04/06 12:25
Subject: Re: [openstac
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
> Most of the
> work to support FPGA will be internal to nova, to deal with modelling
> of assignable devices and their scheduling / allocation.
I think the EPA blueprint already covers some of the FPGA device
Yes the project is quite new, we are still developing requirements at the
OPNFV side. We will update with full description after the summit when we
got all the inputs. Look forward to have a chat with you at the summit :)
I think you are right that Nomad does not solve the problem per se in this
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 12:28:02PM +0200, Roman Dobosz wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 16:12:16 +0800
> Zhipeng Huang wrote:
>
> > You are actually touching on something we have been working on. There is a
> > team in OPNFV DPACC project has been working acceleration related
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 16:12:16 +0800
Zhipeng Huang wrote:
> You are actually touching on something we have been working on. There is a
> team in OPNFV DPACC project has been working acceleration related topics,
> including folks from CMCC, Intel, ARM, Freescale, Huawei. We
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 07:34:46AM +0200, Roman Dobosz wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:58:44 +0100
> "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
>
> > Along similar lines we have proposals to add vGPU support to Nova,
> > where the vGPUs may or may not be exposed using SR-IOV. We also want
>
Hi Roman,
You are actually touching on something we have been working on. There is a
team in OPNFV DPACC project has been working acceleration related topics,
including folks from CMCC, Intel, ARM, Freescale, Huawei. We found out that
in order to have acceleration working under NFV scenrios,
On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:58:44 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> Along similar lines we have proposals to add vGPU support to Nova,
> where the vGPUs may or may not be exposed using SR-IOV. We also want
> to be able to on the fly decide whether any physical GPU is assigned
>
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> As you can see, it seems not complicated at this point, however it
>> become more complex due to following things we also have to take into
>> consideration:
I agree with this. Many kinds of resources could be
Emm... finally this is brought up. We from IBM have already done some
work on FPGA/GPU resource management [1]. Let me bring the SMEs into
this discussion and see if we together can work out a concrete roadmap
to land this upstream.
Fei and Yonghua, this is indeed very interesting a topic for us.
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:27:30PM +0200, Roman Dobosz wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> On yesterday's scheduler meeting I was raised the idea of bringing up
> the FPGA to the OpenStack as the resource, which than might be exposed
> to the VMs.
>
> The use cases for motivations, why one want do this, are
Hey all,
On yesterday's scheduler meeting I was raised the idea of bringing up
the FPGA to the OpenStack as the resource, which than might be exposed
to the VMs.
The use cases for motivations, why one want do this, are pretty broad -
having such chip ready on the computes might be beneficial
12 matches
Mail list logo