On 5/27/2015 7:21 PM, John Griffith wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com
mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.com mailto:berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015
I think this will help because it separates the judgement of is this code
good enough to land from the project and release coordination of should
this code land now.
I've been floating the idea of separating +2 and +A powers for the same
purpose: free up many of the technical reviewers from
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:57:23PM -0700, Michael Still wrote:
Hey,
it would be cool if devs posting changes for nova which depend on us
approving their spec could use Depends-On to make sure their code
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:57:23PM -0700, Michael Still wrote:
Hey,
it would be cool if devs posting changes for nova which depend
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:57:23PM -0700, Michael Still wrote:
Hey,
it would be cool if devs posting changes for nova which depend on us
approving their spec could use Depends-On to make sure their code
doesn't land until the spec does.
Does it actually bring any benefit ? Any change for
Hey,
it would be cool if devs posting changes for nova which depend on us
approving their spec could use Depends-On to make sure their code
doesn't land until the spec does.
Just my random thought for the day.
Michael
--
Rackspace Australia
This seems like a good idea for a pattern in general to use gong forward.
--Morgan
Sent via mobile
On May 22, 2015, at 14:57, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
Hey,
it would be cool if devs posting changes for nova which depend on us
approving their spec could use Depends-On to
