Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] support for multiple active
scheduler policies/drivers
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Alex Glikson wrote:
Russell Bryant wrote on 24/07/2013 07:14:27 PM:
>
> I really like your point about not needing to set things up via a config
> file. Th
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
,
Date: 27/07/2013 01:22 AM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] support for multiple active
scheduler policies/drivers
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Alex Glikson wrote:
Russell Bryant wrote on 24/07/2013 07:14:27 PM:
>
been reported, fixed and will be merged
soon.
"Day, Phil" wrote on 28/07/2013 01:29:22 PM:
> From: "Day, Phil"
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
,
> Date: 28/07/2013 01:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] support for multiple active
> sche
> From: Joe Gordon [mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 26 July 2013 23:16
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] support for multiple active scheduler
> policies/drivers
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:18 PM,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Alex Glikson wrote:
> Russell Bryant wrote on 24/07/2013 07:14:27 PM:
>
> >
> > I really like your point about not needing to set things up via a config
> > file. That's fairly limiting since you can't change it on the fly via
> > the API.
>
>
> True. As I point
Russell Bryant wrote on 24/07/2013 07:14:27 PM:
>
> I really like your point about not needing to set things up via a config
> file. That's fairly limiting since you can't change it on the fly via
> the API.
True. As I pointed out in another response, the ultimate goal would be to
have policie
> From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
> > Sent: 23 July 2013 22:32
> > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] support for multiple active
scheduler
> > policies/drivers
> >
> > On 07/23/2013 04:24 PM, Alex Gliks
On 07/24/2013 05:39 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> I'm inclined to agree with others that I'm not sure you need the complexity
> that this BP brings to the system.If you want to provide a user with a
> choice about how much overcommit they will be exposed to then doing that in
> flavou
ack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] support for multiple active scheduler
> policies/drivers
>
> On 07/23/2013 04:24 PM, Alex Glikson wrote:
> > Russell Bryant wrote on 23/07/2013 07:19:48 PM:
> >
> >> I understand the use case,
On 07/23/2013 04:24 PM, Alex Glikson wrote:
> Russell Bryant wrote on 23/07/2013 07:19:48 PM:
>
>> I understand the use case, but can't it just be achieved with 2 flavors
>> and without this new aggreagte-policy mapping?
>>
>> flavor 1 with extra specs to say aggregate A and policy Y
>> flavor 2
Russell Bryant wrote on 23/07/2013 07:19:48 PM:
> I understand the use case, but can't it just be achieved with 2 flavors
> and without this new aggreagte-policy mapping?
>
> flavor 1 with extra specs to say aggregate A and policy Y
> flavor 2 with extra specs to say aggregate B and policy Z
I
On 07/23/2013 12:02 PM, Alex Glikson wrote:
> Russell Bryant wrote on 23/07/2013 05:35:18 PM:
>> >> #1 - policy associated with a host aggregate
>> >>
>> >> This seems very odd to me. Scheduling policy is what chooses hosts, so
>> >> having a subset of hosts specify which policy to use seems back
Russell Bryant wrote on 23/07/2013 05:35:18 PM:
> >> #1 - policy associated with a host aggregate
> >>
> >> This seems very odd to me. Scheduling policy is what chooses hosts,
so
> >> having a subset of hosts specify which policy to use seems backwards.
> >
> > This is not what we had in mind.
On 07/23/2013 12:24 AM, Alex Glikson wrote:
> Russell Bryant wrote on 23/07/2013 01:04:24 AM:
>> > [1]
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-scheduler-drivers
>> > [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/MultipleSchedulerPolicies
>> > [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/37407/
>
Russell Bryant wrote on 23/07/2013 01:04:24 AM:
> > [1]
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-scheduler-drivers
> > [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/MultipleSchedulerPolicies
> > [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/37407/
>
> Thanks for bringing this up. I do have some c
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 05:15 PM, Alex Glikson wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Following the initial discussions at the last design summit, we have
> > published the design [2] and the first take on the implementation [3] of
> > the blueprint adding sup
On 07/22/2013 05:15 PM, Alex Glikson wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Following the initial discussions at the last design summit, we have
> published the design [2] and the first take on the implementation [3] of
> the blueprint adding support for multiple active scheduler
> policies/drivers [1].
> In a nu
Dear all,
Following the initial discussions at the last design summit, we have
published the design [2] and the first take on the implementation [3] of
the blueprint adding support for multiple active scheduler
policies/drivers [1].
In a nutshell, the idea is to allow overriding the 'default'
18 matches
Mail list logo
